Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16634 (PNJ)

ATMA RAM v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

CRWP/2627/2026 · 2026-03-11

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-2627 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 117 ATMA RAM STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA directions to the respondent 2. petitioner ha before the respondent No.2 stipulated time. 3. 2627-2026 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH ATMA RAM VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Abhinandan Sekhri, Advocate Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 respondents No.4 to 8. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the r has filed the representation dated the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-2627-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 11.03.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. as been filed by the petitioner to protect his life and liberty from sel representing the petitioner submits that the dated 01.02.2026 (Annexure P earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within a to respondents No.1 to 3. (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS for from sel representing the petitioner submits that the (Annexure P-3) earned counsel prays for directions to the to decide the abovementioned representation within a GAURAV THAKUR 2026.03.11 19:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-2627 upon the State 5. hereby disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner and take an independent decision at his own level. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2627-2026 (O&M) 8587 Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, upon the State is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner and take an independent decision at his own Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-3) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner and take an independent decision at his own :Yes/No : Yes/No Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is respondent No.2 to decide the ) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order It with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner and take an independent decision at his own GAURAV THAKUR 2026.03.11 19:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document