Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16633 (AP)

C Jyothi v. State of A.P. rep by its Principal Secretary

WP/40284/2014 · 2026-03-09

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No._40284_2014 APHC010067722014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 40284/2014 Between: 1. C JYOTHI, W/O D ASHOK AGED 27 YEARS, OCC: APO B N KANDRIKA RIO 12-29/4 TARAKARAMA COLONY TIRUCHANURU TIRUPATHI-517503 ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF A P REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD 2. THE MEMBER SECRETARY, SOCIETY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 0/O COMMISSIONER RURAL DEVELOPMENT 5-10-192 HUDA HERMITAGE OFFICE COMPLEX HILL FORT ROAD SAIFABAD HYDERABAD 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY CHITTOOR CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for records relating to the impugned orders vide ROC No: HR/D1/966/2014 dt 31-10-2014 of the 4th respondent placing the petitioner under suspension and quash the same by holding as illegal arbitrary 2 HN, J W.P.No._40284_2014 highhanded and cannot be justified in the eye of law and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate and continue the petitioner with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 50526 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate and continue the petitioner in the service by suspend the impugned proceedings vide ROC No: HR/D1/966/2014 dt 31- 102014 of the 4th respondent forthwith pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WVMP 4878 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt. 29.12.2014 in W.P.No.40284 of 2014 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP) 3 HN, J W.P.No._40284_2014 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that, in accordance with the interim direction passed by this Court on 29.12.2014, the petitioner has been permitted to continue in service until further orders. 2. Recording the said submission, the present writ petition is closed in terms of the interim direction passed by this Court. 3. It is further made clear that the petitioner is at liberty to challenge any proceedings, if so aggrieved by the same. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:10.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No._40284_2014 154 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO:40284 of 2014 Date: 10.03.2026 NKA