Rajendra Prasad @ Rajendra Pd. Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./28281/2026 · 2026-05-05
Ashok Kumar Pandey
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16632 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16632 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28281 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2026 Thana- MASAUDHI District- Patna ====================================================== Rajendra Prasad @ Rajendra Pd. Yadav S/o Late Panchu Prasad @ Panchu Pd. Yadav R/o Village - Gangachak Malikana, P.S. and P.O. - Masaurhi, Dist. - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 05-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 8, 20(b)(ii) (B) of the N.D.P.S. Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that altogether 1 kg 150 grams of ganja like substance was recovered from a grocery shop.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. He was standing there that is why, he has been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that while making seizure, Section
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28281 of 2026(2) dt.05-05-2026 2/2 105 of B.N.SS. has not been complied and the seizure list witnesses are police personnel. He has no concern in any way with the alleged recovery. It has also been submitted that though the quantum of the contraband which has been recovered is more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since
23.02.2026.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 121 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Masaurhi.
Shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T