Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16624 (RAJ)

KAMLESH KUMAR SAINI S/O RAMJI LAL SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/2068/2026 · 2026-02-09

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5976] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2068/2026 Kamlesh Kumar Saini S/o Ramji Lal Saini, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Moroli, Post Mohchingpura, Tehsil Bahrawanda, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Administrative Reforms, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 09/02/2026 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition with following prayer: " It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the writ petitioner be kindly allowed and this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: (i). By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents be directed to change and consider the Category of petitioner from OBC NCL (LD/CP) to OBC NCL (MD/MI-Multiple Disability) Category in the application form of IV Class because third party right has not been accrued. (ii). By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents be directed to give appointment to the petitioner on the post Class IV under MD/MI Category as the petitioner secured [2026:RJ-JP:5976] (2 of 2) [CW-2068/2026] more marks than the last cut off under MD/MI Category. (iii). Any other appropriate writ, order or direction as may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be kindly passed in favour of the petitioner." 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation before the respondents in the light of order dated 01.11.2017 passed by Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1700/2017. 3. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation before the Competent Authority, who shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/46