Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16623 (JHR)

LAL MOHAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3004/2026 · 2026-06-11

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:16815 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3004 of 2026 ------ 1. Lal Mohan Singh, aged about 35 years, son of Bhadu Singh 2. Chandan Singh, aged about 23 years, son of Sukhdev Singh 3. Sajan Mandal @ Sajan Kumar Mandal @ Sajan Kr. Mandal, age about 62 years son of Bhagu Mandal @ Bhagirath Mandal Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 are resident of Goushala More, Tasra basti, Motinagar, P.O. and P.S. Sindri, District Dhanbad 4. Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar Singh @ Manoj Kr. Singh, aged about 30 years, son of Saheb Singh, resident of Rohrabandh, near old Petrol Pump, P.O. and P.S. Sindri, District Dhanbad .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. S.K. Tiwari, Special P.P. ------ 02/11.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sindri P.S. Case No. 28 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2) and 351(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that while attending a wedding ceremony, the altercation took place between the parties. He further submits that the first case has been lodged by the co- accused, Vinod Singh and thereafter, present case has been lodged against the petitioners including Vinod Singh. He next submits that the injury is said to be simple which has come in the order of the learned Sessions Judge. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations of assault are there. 5. Considering that the first case has been lodged by the co- accused, Vinod Singh and thereafter the present case has been lodged and the altercation took place in a wedding party and the injury is said to be simple which has been noted by the learned Sessions Judge, in the 2026:JHHC:16815 attending facts and circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Sindri P.S. Case No. 28 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 16.06.2026