MANOJ KUMAR RAVI @ MANOJ RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1426/2026 · 2026-06-15
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16620 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16620 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:17229] -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 1426 of 2026
Manoj Kumar Ravi @ Manoj Ram, aged about 34 years, son of Ratnu Ram, resident of Village-Puso, P.O.-Puso, P.S.-Sisai, District-Gumla (Jharkhand).
..... … Petitioner
Versus State of Jharkhand
..... … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate. For the State
: Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 15.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sisai P.S. Case No. 137 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 310(2) and 311 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gumla.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the name of the petitioner has come only on the basis of confessional statement of the apprehended co-accused. He next submits that two of the other co- accused persons have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. Nos. 2773 and 2775 of 2026 by the co- ordinate bench of this court. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner.
4.
Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the CDR reveals that this petitioner was in constant touch with the other accused persons. On this ground, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected.
5.
It transpires from two orders of the co-ordinate bench that
[2026:JHHC:17229] -2-
except the CDR and the confessional statement of the other co- accused, there is nothing against this petitioner and further in identical situation, two of the co-accused have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate bench in the aforementioned A.B.As.
6.
In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, above named.
7.
Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gumla, in connection with Sisai P.S. Case No. 137 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-15.06.2026 Amitesh/-