Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16615 (RAJ)

SHIV RAJ v. SANTOSH KUMAR AND ORS

CMA/541/2008 · 2026-02-04

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5224] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.541/2008 Shivraj Parewa Son of Shri Ramswaroop aged about 23 years, resident of Shishak Colony, Dausa, District Dausa. ----Appellant Versus 1. Santosh Kumar son of Shri Chhuttan Das resident of Plot No. 1-Kha-17, Sector No. 4, H.M. Udaipur(Driver of Mini bus No. RJ-14-1P-3858) 2. Razak son of Shri Babu Khan resident of plot No. 1085, Lodi Ki Gali, Moti Doongari Road, Jaipur (Owner of Mini bus No. RJ-14- 1P-3858) 3. Kailash Chand Sharma son of Shri Namalum resident of Plot No. 45 Rajamal Ji Ka Bagh, Amer, Jaipur (Policyholder of Mini bus No. RJ-14-1P-3858) 4. National Insurance Company Limited through Senior Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, M.I. Road, (Insurance Company of Mini bus No. RJ-14-1P-3858) ----Non-claimants/Respondents For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Tyagi JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 04/02/2026 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. 2. The Office report indicates that the order dated 03.02.2025 passed by this Court has not been complied with and no steps have been taken for filing the P.F., Notice, Paper Book and Registry Charges of unserved respondents. 3. In spite of passing of more than a year of the aforesaid order, it has not been complied with. This appeal is lying pending [2026:RJ-JP:5224] (2 of 2) [CMA-541/2008] before this Court since 2008, i.e., more than 17 years have passed thereafter. 4. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this matter and he has lost interest in pursuing this matter. 5. In view of the above, the misc. appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. 6. However, the appellant would be at liberty to move application for revival of this appeal, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/28