[2026:RJ-JP:6505] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2419/2026 Nitish Urf Nitesh Urf Black Urf Kalu S/o Umed Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Makhar Ki Dhani, Police Station Bagar District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Udaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bal Kishan Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jeetendra Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 11/02/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.0119/2025 registered at Police Station Bagar, District Jhunjhunu for offence(s) under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2), 307, 119(1), 111(3), 351(2) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has no nexus with the alleged offence. Learned counsel further submits that co-accused namely, Sandeep Kumar Urf Dang (in SB Criminal Bail Application No.1880/2026) has been granted bail vide order dated 31.01.2026 and Ajay Jakhar & Anuj @ Bhanja (in SB Criminal Bail Applications No.17090/2025 & 1131/2026 respectively) have been [2026:RJ-JP:6505] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2419/2026] granted bail vide order dated 22.01.2026 by a Co-ordinate Bench. Learned counsel also submits that the injuries are simple in nature; no recovery has been made from the petitioner and petitioner is in custody since 08.10.2025, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody, hence, petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that petitioner has criminal antecedents and as many as 17 cases are pending against him, hence bail application of petitioner deserves to be dismissed. 4. In response thereto, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that out of 17 cases, petitioner has already been acquitted in 9 cases. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that the co-accused have been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench; injuries are simple in nature; petitioner is in custody since long and conclusion of trial will take considerable long time, without commenting anything on the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Nitish Urf Nitesh Urf Black Urf Kalu S/o Umed Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (one of the relatives of accused petitioner), each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the [2026:RJ-JP:6505] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2419/2026] petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused - petitioner is directed to mark his presence before the concerned Police Station in 1st week of every month till conclusion of trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall forward petitioner's attendance report to the trial Court on the same day of each month. In case of any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be at liberty to move an application against the petitioner for cancellation of bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN-/69