Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16609 (PNJ)

TEENA CHOUDHARY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/21134/2026 · 2026-04-20

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF TEENA CHOUDHARY AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Nikhil Ghai, Mr. Munish Puri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) This is a petition under to official respondents No.1 to 4 No.5 to 9 under the relevant provision of BNS and IT Act on the basis of the written complaint dated 26.03.2026 (Annexure P4). Learned counsel f in case a direction be issued to dated 26.03.2026 (Annexure P Without adverting to the merits of the case and in view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent Superintendent of dated 26.03.2026 accordance with law. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 20.04.2026 Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH TEENA CHOUDHARY AND ANOTHER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Nikhil Ghai, Advocate with Mr. Munish Puri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 528 of BNS Act, 2023, official respondents No.1 to 4 to take prompt action No.5 to 9 under the relevant provision of BNS and IT Act on the basis of the written complaint dated 26.03.2026 (Annexure P4). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ion be issued to respondent No.3 26.03.2026 (Annexure P-4). Without adverting to the merits of the case and in view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent Superintendent of Police, Pathankot is directed to look into dated 26.03.2026 (Annexure P-4) and decide the accordance with law. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ( Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-21134-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 20.04.2026 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab. Section 528 of BNS Act, 2023, for direction take prompt action against the respondent No.5 to 9 under the relevant provision of BNS and IT Act on the basis of the written complaint dated 26.03.2026 (Annexure P4). or the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied respondent No.3 to look into the representation Without adverting to the merits of the case and in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.3-Senior is directed to look into the representation ) and decide the same expeditiously in The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE direction against the respondent No.5 to 9 under the relevant provision of BNS and IT Act on the basis of the satisfied the representation the Senior the representation same expeditiously in HIMANSHU 2026.04.21 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document