Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16608 (AP)

RAJA KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY CHADALAVADA v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/928/2020 · 2026-01-27

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010064792020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between: 1. RAJA KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY CHADALAVADA, S/O. PURNACHANDRA RAO, R/O. 3 DISTRICT 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI. 2. COMMISSIONER, GREATER VISAKHA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Co 2018 on the file of XVI Metropolitan Magistrate at Bheminipatnam, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grou High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners, who is the 2nd Accused in CC No. 241 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble XVI MM at Bhiminipatnam Counsel for the Petitioner/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 928/2020 RAJA KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY CHADALAVADA, S/O. PURNACHANDRA RAO, R/O. 3-7/1, AMRUTHALURU, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI. GREATER VISAKHA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtto quash the proceedings in CC No. 241 of 2018 on the file of XVI Metropolitan Magistrate at Bheminipatnam, and pass Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners, who is the 2nd Accused in CC No. 241 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble XVI MM at Bhiminipatnam Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO RAJA KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY CHADALAVADA, S/O. 7/1, AMRUTHALURU, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GREATER VISAKHA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of urtto quash the proceedings in CC No. 241 of 2018 on the file of XVI Metropolitan Magistrate at Bheminipatnam, and pass Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the nds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners, who is the 2nd Accused in CC No. 241 of 2018 1. SUBRAHMANYAM KURELLA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 928/2020 ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.,’)/Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/Accused No.2 in C.C.No.241 of 2018 on the file of XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, Bhiminipatnam registered for the alleged offences punishable under Section 420, 467, 468, 471 read with 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860, (for brevity, ‘the IPC’) 2. No representation for the petitioner. Even on 20.01.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. For the past five years, no notice was served on respondents. Petition is of the year 2020 one of the oldest cases pending on this roster. 3. In view of the above, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, any Miscellaneous Petitions, if pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 28.01.2026 KKV THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO 250 CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 928/2020 Date: 28.01.2026 KKV