Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16607 (CHH)

KESHAV SAO v. RAM LAL PATEL

ACQA/369/2018 · 2026-01-28

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Smt Rajani Dubey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:4856-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 369 of 2018 1 - Keshav Sao S/o Bhagat Ram Sao Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Ghumabhatha, Post Ganekaira, P. S. Basna District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - Ram Lal Patel S/o Ratthu Ram Patel Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Ghumabhatha, P. S. Basna District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 2 - Bhagwati Nayak S/o Panch Ram Nayak Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Koliha Devari, Post Ganekaira, P. S. Basna District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 3 - Dilip Sidar S/o Nehru Lal Sidar Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Durugpali, P. S. Basna District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 4 - Taruni Yadav S/o Purno Yadav Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Koliha Devary, P. S. Basna District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The P. S. Basna District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Appellant : None For Respondents : None For State : Ms. N. K. Kashyap, PL Hon’ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey, J. Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal, J. Order on Board Per, Rajani Dubey, J. 29.01.2026 1. When the matter was listed on 16.01.2026, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant. Today also when the matter is called for hearing, no Digitally signed by AMIT PATEL 2 one appears on behalf of the appellant. This Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the instant appeal for want of prosecution. 2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge AMIT PATEL