1 2026:CGHC:4890 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 363 of 2026 1 - Ishwari Lal Soni S/o Late Manrakhan Lal Soni Aged About 82 Years R/o Bramh Chowk, Near Gokulpur School, Mahatma Gandhi Ward, Tahsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Urban Administration Development, Indravati Bhawan, Mantralay, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Divisional Commissioner Raipur Division Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - The District Collector District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 5 - The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Dhamtari, Near Itwari Bazar, Post - Tahsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 6 - The Estate Officer (Bhawan Adhikari) Municipal Corporation Dhamtari, Near Itwari Bazar, Post - Tahsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 7 - The Tahsildar Tahsil Dhamtari District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 8 - Mrs. Yamini Sahu W/o Amarchand Sahu Aged About 39 Years R/o Ganpati Chowk, Tahsil Magarlod, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 9 - Amarchand Sahu S/o Umend Ram Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o Ganpati Chowk, Tahsil Magarlod, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Mr. Praveen Soni, Advocate For State/Respondents No.1 to 4 & 7 For Respondents No.5 & 6 : : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. Govt. Adv. Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate. RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.01.30 10:43:50 +0530 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 29/01/2026 1. Heard. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy for redressal of his grievance. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 7. Certified copy of the impugned order and relevant documents be returned to counsel for the petitioner after retaining xerox copy of the same. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Rukhsar