ROHIDAS MANGU RATHOD AND ANR v. PRIYANKA W/O. YOGESH RATHOD AND OTHERS
APPLN/1233/2020 · 2026-10-06
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16604 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16604 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 912 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1233 OF 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1233 OF 2020 IN WP/548/2019 ROHIDAS MANGU RATHOD AND ANR VERSUS PRIYANKA W/O. YOGESH RATHOD AND OTHERS ... None for Applicants Adv. U. S. Bhosale, APP for Respondents-State Adv. A. R. Rothod, Advocate for Respondent No.1 ...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 06/10/2026
Per Court: . None for the applicants.
2. It appears that applicants have not circulated the matter after
2021. Moreover, the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 i.e. wife of the deceased, on instructions, submits that the amount of Rs.8,00,000/- was granted as a compensation regarding death of the respondent No.1 in custody and the said amount is already transferred in account of respondent No.1 on 06.07.2020. Additionally, the learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that after the demise of her husband the respondent No.1 has already married with the younger brother of the deceased i.e. son of present applicants. 2026:BHC-AUG:47319-DB
2 912 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1233 OF 2020
3. Under such circumstances, the applicants are not prosecuting the matter diligently and the application stands dismissed for non prosecution.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/