APHC010066722026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION Between: 1. BUSANABOINA LAKSHMI PERANTALLU,, W/O RAM BABU, HINDU AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D NO. 1 SEETHANNAPALLI VILLAGE, KAIKALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1. NANDIGAMA ADI LAKSHMI, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1 MUSUNURU MANDAL, PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT. 2. SURAPANENI VENKATA NAGA MANI, W/O VIJAY KUMAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O MARLAPALEM VILLAGE, CHATRAI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, pleased to Set aside the docket order dated 05.02.2026 passed in E.A.No.31/2025 IN E.P.No.01 /2025 IN O.S.NO.59/2018 on the file of the learned court of Senior Civil Judge (Senior Division) At Kaikaluru, Krishna District and Pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in E.P.No.1/2025 in O.S.No.59/2018 pending on the file of the Senior Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaikaluru, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 525/2026 BUSANABOINA LAKSHMI PERANTALLU,, W/O RAM BABU, HINDU AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D NO. 1-54, DODDIPATIA, SEETHANNAPALLI VILLAGE, KAIKALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA ...PETITIONER AND NANDIGAMA ADI LAKSHMI, W/O PURNACHANDRA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-79/1, GOPAVARAM VILLAGE, MUSUNURU MANDAL, PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT. SURAPANENI VENKATA NAGA MANI, W/O VIJAY KUMAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O MARLAPALEM VILLAGE, CHATRAI U DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be Set aside the docket order dated 05.02.2026 passed in /2025 IN E.P.No.01 /2025 IN O.S.NO.59/2018 on the file of the learned court of Senior Civil Judge (Senior Division) At Kaikaluru, Krishna Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated fidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in E.P.No.1/2025 in O.S.No.59/2018 pending on the file of the Senior Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaikaluru, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3163] THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY BUSANABOINA LAKSHMI PERANTALLU,, W/O RAM BABU, HINDU 54, DODDIPATIA, SEETHANNAPALLI VILLAGE, KAIKALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA ...PETITIONER W/O PURNACHANDRA RAO, HINDU, 79/1, GOPAVARAM VILLAGE, MUSUNURU MANDAL, PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT. SURAPANENI VENKATA NAGA MANI, W/O VIJAY KUMAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O MARLAPALEM VILLAGE, CHATRAI ...RESPONDENT(S): praying that in the the High Court may be Set aside the docket order dated 05.02.2026 passed in /2025 IN E.P.No.01 /2025 IN O.S.NO.59/2018 on the file of the learned court of Senior Civil Judge (Senior Division) At Kaikaluru, Krishna Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated fidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in E.P.No.1/2025 in O.S.No.59/2018 pending on the file of the Senior Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaikaluru, 2 CMR,J C.R.P.No.525 of 2026 including but not limited to execution of delivery warrant, break-open of doors, forcible eviction, redelivery of possession or any coercive steps whatsoever, pending the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition and Pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T ARUNACHALAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 CMR,J C.R.P.No.525 of 2026 The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This revision is preferred against the order dated 05.02.2026 passed in E.A.No.31 of 2025 in E.P.No.01 of 2025 in O.S.No.59 of 2018 on the file of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaikaluru. 3. The petitioner is the 2nd judgment debtor in the execution proceedings before the executing Court. A decree dated 14.10.2024 against her was passed by the trial Court in O.S.No.59 of 2018 on the file of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaikaluru, to deliver the possession of the plaint schedule property. As she did not obey the decree, the decree holder has filed the execution petition for delivery of the property through Court. The executing Court has ordered for delivery of the property by breaking open the lock of the E.P. schedule property. 4. The said order is now challenged only on the ground that the petitioner intends to file a second appeal and without giving sufficient time that the delivery is ordered by the executing Court. The said ground is not a valid ground to entertain this revision. No valid ground is emanating from the record to find fault with the impugned order of the executing Court. 5. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this revision. If the petitioner intends to prefer second appeal, nothing prevents her from approaching the Court and to obtain stay by the second appellate Court. As there is no stay, she cannot seek stay of the said proceedings in this revision and this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY Date: 20.02.2026 MDP