Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16599 (AP)

KANTANA PADMA KUMARI v. SRI KANTANA NAGESWARA RAO

CMA/1255/2009 · 2026-03-01

Balaji Medamalli, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.1255 OF 2009) APHC010062122009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1255/2009 Between: 1. KANTANA PADMA KUMARI, W/O.SRI NAGESWARA RAO, HINDU HOUSEWIFE C/O.ANAPARTHI PAPAYYA GARI VISWANADHAM, NEAR KESAVA SWAMY & SUBRAHMANYA SWAMY TEMPLE, KANURU VILAGE, PERAVALI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. SRI KANTANA NAGESWARA RAO, S/o.Sri Doraiah, Hindu Nil R/o.H.No.2-61, Hukumpeta, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders- IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CMAMP 2441 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order and decree made in OP No.177/2008 on the file of the court of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry, dated 20.11.2009 pending disposal of the present appeal Counsel for the Appellant: 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. CH DHANAMJAYA The Court made the following: 2 (RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.1255 OF 2009) JUDGMENT:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This appeal has been filed by the appellant/wife being aggrieved from the decree of divorce, filed under Sections 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955, filed by respondent/husband vide judgment and decree dated 20.11.2009 passed in O.P.No.177 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry. 2. On 17.12.2025 the following order was passed: “The appeal has been filed by the wife being aggrieved by the decree of divorce in favour of respondent-husband. 2. In the appeal there is interim suspension of the divorce decree. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that respondent-husband has died. He seeks time to file appropriate application. 4. Post after Sankranthi Vacation, 2026.” 2. On 16.02.2026 the following order was passed: “Learned counsel for the appellant/wife prays for time to file an appropriate application, in view of the death of the respondent/husband. 2. Post after two (02) weeks.” 3. On 16.02.2026, we granted time to file an appropriate application in view of the death of the respondent/husband. 3 (RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.1255 OF 2009) 4. Sri K. Srinivas Rao, learned counsel representing Sri N. Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant/wife submits that, as per the instructions received from the appellant, no further orders are required in the appeal. 5. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ___________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J Date :02.03.2026. RPD. 4 (RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.1255 OF 2009) 214 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI (DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION) CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1255 OF 2009 Date: 02.03.2026 RPD.