Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16594 (CHH)

ANNPURNA TIWARI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/350/2024 · 2026-01-30

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:5415 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 350 of 2024 Annpurna Tiwari D/o Shri Rambaran Tiwari Aged About 54 Years Profession - Advocate, R/o Flat No. 403, Chandra Park, Near Brhaspati Bazar, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (Permanent Resident Of Nayapara, Kirti Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Tahsil And Civil / Revenue, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Superintendent Of Police Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Station House Officer Civil Lines Police Station, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Raminder Singh Bhatia S/o Shri Parvinder Singh Bhatia Aged About 35 Years R/o A-6, 25 Bungalows, Vyapar Vihar Road, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, -Pin- 495001. 5 - M/s Black Diamond Trackparts Private Limited Plot No. 20, Sirgitti Industrial Area, Sector-C, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.02.02 10:59:48 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kishore Bhaduri, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Harsh Dave, Advocate For State For Res. No. 3 and 4 : : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Govt. Advocate Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 31.01.2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge-sheet in the present case was filed against the petitioner on 30.11.2024, and the matter is now fixed for framing of charges on 12.02.2026. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Cr.M.P. 2. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned State counsel. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Cr.M.P. stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice sagrika