TAPASH GHOSH @ TAPAS BANGALI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5277/2026 · 2026-06-15
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16586 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16586 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:17178] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5277 of 2026
------ Tapash Ghosh @ Tapas Bangali, son of late Biban Ratan Ghosh, aged about 50 years, resident of C/O Tarun Kumar Gupta, Rameswar Colony, P.O. and P.S. Saraikella, District- Seraikella Kharsawan, Jharkhand
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-15-06-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mango P.S. Case No.438 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Section 307/304 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder the informant- Subham Kumar by firing upon him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para- 35 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of own confessional statement. It is also submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that no witness has been examined as yet by the trial court. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.01.2026 as has been mentioned in
para-13 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.,1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Mango P.S. Case No.438 of 2022 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-15.06.2026-Animesh/