[2026:RJ-JP:5290] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 184/2026 1. Ifra Daughter Of Yusuf Ali Wife Of Noushad Abbas, (Dob - 08/03/2007), Resident Of Dhanka Basti, Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur At Present (With Husband) 9274, Veeru Ki Dukan Ke Aage, G.m. Nurshing Home Ke Pass, Hasanpura A, Jaipur (Raj.), Pin 302006, Aadhaar Card No. 5617 7137 9349. 2. Noushad Abbas Son Of Abdul Wahid, Aged About 24 Years, (Dob-09/05/2001), Resident Of 9274, Veeru Ki Dukan Ke Aage, G.m. Nurshing Home Ke Pass, Hasanpura A, Jaipur (Raj.), Pin 302006, Aadhaar Card No. 5166 5875 6542. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. 3. The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Police Commissionerate, Jaipur. 4. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur West, Mini Secretariat, Jaipur. 5. The Additional Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur West, Mini Secretariat, Jaipur. 6. The Assistant Commissioner Of Police, Sadar Jaipur West, Mini Secretariat, Jaipur. 7. The Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar Jaipur, Jaipur West, Near Railway Station, Jaipur. 8. Yusuf Ali Son Of Inayat Khan, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 9. Sahrukh Son Of Inayat Khan, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 10. Yunush Son Of Inayat Khan, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 11. Sadakat Son Of Yunush, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 12. Arbaj Ghangu Son Of Not Know, Resident Of [2026:RJ-JP:5290] (2 of 4) [CRLW-184/2026] Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 13. Genda Sahrukh Son Of Not Know, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 14. Lucky Son Of Not Know, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 15. Idrish Son Of Not Know, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 16. Furkan Son Of Not Know, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 17. Nisar Ali @ Sadar Son Of Not Know, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 18. Lala @ Sabeer Son Of Not Know, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 19. Azaz @ Azu Son Of Mustak Ali, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 20. Sajeed Son Of Not Know, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 21. Mustak Kan Son Of Not Know, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 22. Bunty Son Of Mustak Ali, Resident Of Kayamkhaniyo Ki Masjid Ke Pas, Hasanpura A, Station Road, Jaipur 23. Arshad Son Of Not Know, Resident Of Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prameshwar Pilania For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Puniya, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 04/02/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. [2026:RJ-JP:5290] (3 of 4) [CRLW-184/2026] 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 8 to 23 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 03.01.2026 at Dargah Karbala Ramgarh Mode Jaipur Rajasthan and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Hawa Mahal Amber Zone Jaipur Rajasthan. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been submitted today in the Court, which is taken on record. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 8 to 23 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they have prayed for protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Dy. Government Advocate has opposed the same. 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signature have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will [2026:RJ-JP:5290] (4 of 4) [CRLW-184/2026] provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 9. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending, in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Rinchu/181