Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16585 (GAU)

SRI RAJIB KUMAR DUTTA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/3468/2026 · 2026-10-12

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010212612026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3468/2026 SRI RAJIB KUMAR DUTTA SO. LATE RABINDRA KUAR DUTTA, RO. RANGIRKHARI TARANI ROAD, SILCHAR 78005, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, KAHILIPARA, GHY, ASSAM 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER NOW DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR PO SILCHAR DIST CACHAR ASSAM 3:SMT HIMASREE DEKA ACS EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE CACHAR PO SILCHAR DIST CACHAR ASSAM PIN 78800 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R SIKDAR, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, SEC. EDU. Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 13.10.2026 Heard Mr. A.R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the applicant. This interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant for withdrawal of the writ petition being WP(C) No.1375/2023 filed by the applicant as petitioner therein. Mr. P.K. Roy, learned Senior Counsel for the opposite party does not object to the prayer made, however, no liberty should be granted to the petitioner to re-file the same. No objection is also raised by Ms. P. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education. Mr. A.R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the applicant on the other hand submits that he simply wants to withdraw the writ petition and seeks no liberty. In view of the submissions made, this interlocutory application being No.3468/2026 is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant