Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16581 (KAR)

SRI PAVAN RAMASWAMY v. SHWETHA RAMASWAMY

WP/6687/2026 · 2026-03-05

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13443 WP No. 6687 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 6687 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI PAVAN RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, S/O BELERANAGAPPA RAMASWAMY, R/A RAILWAY GOLLAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 562 123. 2. SMT. JAYANTHI RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, W/O BELERANAGAPPA RAMASWAMY, R/AT RAILWAY GOLLAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 562 123. BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED …PETITIONERS (BY SRI.D.R.RAVISHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI.SIRI RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHWETHA RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, D/O. BELERANAGAPPA RAMASWAMY, W/O. RANGANATHAN S.K, Digitally signed by CHAITHANYA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13443 WP No. 6687 of 2026 R/A NO.2351, RAJAJINAGAR, 9TH MAIN, II 'E' BLOCK, BANGALORE - 560 010. 2. MYSORE HOUSING COMPANY (P) LTD., REPT.BY ITS PROMOTER SHARE HOLDER, BELERANGAPPA RAMASWAMY, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: FLAT NO.411, 4TH FLOOR, B BLOCK, PLATINUM CITY HMT ROAD, OFF-TUMKUR ROAD, NEXT TO CMTI, YESHWANTHPUR, BENGALURU - 560 022. PAN: AAGCM9480R EMAIL.ID.VANIMINEBRA@GMAIL.COM 3. REGISTERED OF COMPANIES, REPT.BY ITS REGISTRAR, E WING, II FLOOR, KENDRIYA SADANA, KOARMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034. 4. BELERANGAPPA RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, S/O LATE BELERANGAPPA, R/AT RAILWAY GOLLAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 562 123. 5. BELERANGAPPA KRISHNASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O.LATE BELERANGAPPA, R/AT FLAT NO.302, II FLOOR, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13443 WP No. 6687 of 2026 R.V.APARTMENTS NO.31, NO.99, PIPELINE ROAD, 11TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE CONTINUATION OF PROCEEDINGS IN C.P.NO.120/BB/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH, AS BEING WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND NON-MAINTAINABLE IN LAW, AS PER ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The captioned petition is filed seeking the following reliefs: "a) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the continuation of proceedings in C.P.No.120/BB/2022 on the file of the Hon'ble National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench, as being without jurisdiction and non- maintainable in law, as per Annexure-A; - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13443 WP No. 6687 of 2026 b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the National Law Tribunal to expedite the proceedings within a time frame. c) Vacate and set aside the interim order of status quo dated 18.11.2022 in C.P.No.120/BB/2022, continuation orders as per Annexure-B; and and subsequent continuation orders as per Annexure-B; and d) Grant such other relief/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, including costs, in the interest of justice and equity." 2. Learned Senior counsel while addressing his arguments, did not press the prayer A for the present and restricted himself to seeking indulgence at the hands of this Court to consider prayer B. While doing so, learned Senior counsel has brought to the notice of this Court that out of the three petitions, two petitioners have already withdrawn and in this backdrop, he would try to persuade this Court to issue directions to the National Company Law Tribunal (for short, 'NCLT') to fix the timeline. 3. Though this Court was not inclined initially to fix any timeline while issuing directions, this Court is of the view that in the backdrop of the fact that two of the petitioners have withdrawn their petition, the NCLT may expedite the pending - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13443 WP No. 6687 of 2026 petition filed by the petitioner and decide it in accordance with law and shall also make an endeavor to decide the petition within a period of four months. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22