Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16581 (BOM)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER v. YASHWANT NAGU SUTAR

FA/351/2015 · 2026-09-30

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FA 331/15 & Anr. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 331 FIRST APPEAL NO. 331 OF 2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER VERSUS USMAN IMAN MULLA DIED LRS JALIL AND OTHERS ... AGP for Appellants/State : Mr. A.D. Wange ... 333 FIRST APPEAL NO. 351 OF 2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER VERSUS YASHWANT NAGU SUTAR ... AGP for Appellants/State : Mr. S.N. Morampalle ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10882 OF 2018 IN X-OBJST/33319/2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10885 OF 2018 IN X-OBJST/33319/2015 ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. Dated : September 30, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. As the present acquisition proceedings are initiated in the year 1994, with the consent of learned AGPs heard finally. 2. By these appeal, the appellants/State assails the judgment and award dated 9.11.2011 and 3.10.2011 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Omerga in LAR Nos. 668 and 663 of 2025, which arises out of rehabilitation of earthquake affected persons from Sastur village. 3. The learned AGPs in respective matters submit that this court decided the FA No. 3893/2003 filed by the original claimants arising out of the same project in which rate of Rs.20,000/- per R. was enhanced. 4. In view of the submission made above, I find that once this Court has 2026:BHC-AUG:46583 FA 331/15 & Anr. 2 enhanced the compensation arising out of the same project, the present appeals filed by the State does not survive and hence, both the appeals filed by the State are dismissed. Civil application filed in those appeals, if any, also stands disposed of. 5. Cross objections filed in above appeals be listed on 14.10.2026. ( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) ssc/