Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1658 (MAD)

M.Aruldoss v. The District collector

WP/12116/2026 · 2026-04-07

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 12116 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 12116 of 2026 M.Aruldoss ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu. 2. The Revenue Divisional officer Tambaram Revenue Division, Chengalpattu District. 3. The Tahsildar Thiruporur Taluk, Chengalpattu District. 4. A.Roopanathan ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s appeal dated 14.07.2025 relating to the patta issued in patta No.10156 dated 19.12.2024 in favour of the 4th respondent in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.224/1A15, Pudupakkam Village, Chengalpattu District, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12116 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Dharani For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash, Government Advocate (For R1 to R3) O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking early disposal of the petitioner’s appeal dated 14.07.2025, pending on the file of the 1st respondent. Aggrieved by the issuance of patta dated 19.12.2024 in favour of the 4th respondent (Patta No.10156), the petitioner had preferred the aforesaid appeal dated 14.07.2025, before the 1st respondent. 2.Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. 3.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s appeal is directed to be disposed of by the 2nd respondent after hearing the objections of the 4th respondent and by adhering to the Principles of natural justice, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Since no adverse orders are passed as against the 4th respondent, notice to the 4th respondent in this Writ Petition is dispensed with by this Court. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12116 of 2026 4.For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the 2nd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s appeal dated 14.07.2025, after hearing the objections of the 4th respondent and any other necessary party whom the 2nd respondent deem fit to enquire and by adhering to the Principles of natural justice, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 07-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GSA To 1. The District collector Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu 2. The Revenue Divisional officer Tambaram Revenue Division, Chengalpattu District. 3. The Tahsildar Thiruporur Taluk, Chengalpattu District. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12116 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA WP No. 12116 of 2026 07-04-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis