MAHIMA D/O VIJAY SINGH W/O RAJ KUNVAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/187/2026 · 2026-02-04
Bhuwan Goyal
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16579 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16579 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:5231] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 187/2026
1. Mahima D/o Vijay Singh W/o Raj Kunvar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Chothia Thok, Basua, Bansi Khurd, Bharatpur Rajasthan. At Present R/o Bamanpura, Ramnagar, Alwar Rajasthan
2. Raj Kanvar S/o Maharaj Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bamanpura, Ramnagar, Alwar Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur.
3. The Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur District Bharatpur.
4. The Nodal Officer, Bharatpur Special Investigation Unit Crime Against Women, Cell, Bharatpur.
5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
6. The Station House Officer, Police Station Khatumar, District Alwar (Raj.)
7. Vijay Singh S/o Man Singh, R/o Chothia Thok, Bansi Khurd Basua, Bharatpur Rajasthan.
8. Abhay Singh S/o Vijay Singh, R/o Chothia Thok, Bansi Khurd Basua, Bharatpur Rajasthan.
9. Than Singh S/o Man Singh, R/o Chothia Thok, Bansi Khurd Basua, Bharatpur Rajasthan.
10. Sahab Singh S/o Man Singh, R/o Chothia Thok, Bansi Khurd Basua, Bharatpur Rajasthan.
11. Suraj Singh S/o Thansingh, R/o Chothia Thok, Bansi Khurd Basua, Bharatpur Rajasthan.
12. Shasant S/o Sahab Singh, R/o Chothia Thok, Bansi Khurd Basua, Bharatpur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Jain
[2026:RJ-JP:5231] (2 of 3) [CRLW-187/2026] For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Addl.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 04/02/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled.
2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 7 to 12 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 21.01.2026 at Arya Samaj, Sanstha Nayk Khera Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Vidhyadhar Nagar Zone, Jaipur Rajasthan. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 7 to 12 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the
judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522.
5. Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the same.
[2026:RJ-JP:5231] (3 of 3) [CRLW-187/2026]
6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signatures have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel.
7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is
directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them.
8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
9. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J Anu /168