Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16579 (JHR)

BANDHAN MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3046/2026 · 2026-06-12

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:16986 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3046 of 2026 ------ 1. Bandhan Mahto, aged about 53 years, son of Late Goverdhan Mahto 2. Dinesh Mahto @ Dinesh Kumar Mahto, aged about 35 years, son of Harlal Mahto 3. Narendra Singh @ Babaiya Singh @ Narendra Kumar Singh, aged about 51 years, son of Late Brij Bihari 4. Pritam Mahto @ Pritam Kumar Mahto, aged about 33 years, son of Bandhan Mahto 5. Arvind Yadav @ Arvind Seth @ Arvind Kumar Yadav, aged about 48 years, son of Nawal Kishor Yadav .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kumar Jha, A.P.P. ------ 02/12.06.2026 This matter relates to Bermo P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026 and the case is pending in the court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat. 2. After some argument, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw instant petition with liberty to move before learned court on strength of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51. 3. Learned counsel for respondent State has got no objection for same. 4. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 16.06.2026