SANJAY AND ANR v. STATE(GOVT.NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR
CRL.M.C./6249/2026 · 2026-08-24
Saurabh Banerjee
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16576 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16576 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~89 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010397002026 + CRL.M.C. 6249/2026
SANJAY AND ANR
.....Petitioners Through: Mr. Subhash Chandra Lochakia, Adv. versus
STATE(GOVT.NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocates. SI- K.P. Singh, PS: New Ashok Nagar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R %
24.08.2026
1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.42/2023 dated 23.01.2023 registered at PS.: New Ashok Nagar under Sections 308/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom as the petitioners and respondent no.2 have mutually settled all their disputes vide Settlement dated 12.05.2026. 2. Issue notice. 3. Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits that she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 4. Respondent no.2 also accepts notice and submits that he has no objection if the present petition is allowed. 5. This Court has further had the occasion of interacting with the petitioners as well as the respondent no.2, who all are present in Court. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 15:14:05
They affirm the terms of the aforesaid Settlement dated 12.05.2026, wherein it is recorded that the petitioners and the respondent no.2 have amicable settled all their disputes inter se themselves and they have agreed to put a quietus to their disputes. Respondent no.2 hence submits that he does not wish to continue with the aforesaid FIR against the petitioners. 6. The petitioners and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials, as on record, have been duly identified by the IO. 7. As noted above, a settlement based on mutual terms between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 is the basis of filing the present petition, which is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, the present is a fit case for quashing the aforesaid FIR. Accordingly, as also following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors.
vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, and also since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the present FIR will be an exercise in futility. 8. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.42/2023 dated 23.01.2023 registered at PS.: New Ashok Nagar under Sections 308/506/34 of the IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. 9. As such, the present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J AUGUST 24, 2026/Ab This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 15:14:05