Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16571 (CHH)

DEV AUTO v. SMT. NANDNI BAI DHIMAR

MAC/813/2025 · 2026-01-29

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:5163 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 813 of 2025 • Dev Auto Authorized Dealer - T.V.S. Company, Patan, Proprietor Dev Narayan Sahu S/o Late Ramchandra Sahu, R/o Vilage - Teligundra, Tahsil - Patan, District - Durg (C.G.), (Financer) ... Appellant versus 1. Smt. Nandni Bai Dhimar W/o Late Dinesh Kumar Dhimar Aged About 41 Years R/o Village - Sikola, Post - Bathena, P.S.- Patan, Tahsil - Patan., District - Durg (C.G.), (Claimants) 2. Kusumlata Dhimar D/o Dinesh Kumar Dhimar Aged About 22 Years W/o Birendra Kumar, R/o Ward No.-18, Patel Para, Danitola, Tahsil And District - Balod (C.G.) 3. Daneshwar Dhimar S/o Dinesh Kumar Dhimar Aged About 21 Years R/o Village - Sikola, Post - Bathena, P.S.- Patan, Tahsil - Patan., District - Durg (C.G.) 4. Devendra Dhimar S/o Late Dinesh Kumar Dhimar Aged About 19 Years R/o Village - Sikola, Post - Bathena, P.S.- Patan, Tahsil - Patan., District - Durg (C.G.) 5. Harpreet Singh S/o Swarn Singh Aged About 28 Years R/o Vill. And Post - Sipkona, P.S. And Tahsil - Patan, District - Durg (C.G.), (Driver Of T.V.S. Xl No. C.G.-07- B.B.-2263) 6. Vijay Dewangan S/o Bhagirthi Dewangan Aged About 33 Years R/o Mahaveer Chowk, Patan, Post - Patan, P.S. And Tahsil - Patan, District - Durg (C.G.), (Owner Of T.V.S. Xl No. C.G.-07- B.B.-2263) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr. Swapnil Thawaney, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 4/ : Ms. Khusboo Sahu, Advocate holding the brief Claimants of Mr. A.D. Kuldeep Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 30.01 .2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.01.30 15:08:13 +0530 2 dispute has already been settled between the parties out of the Court; therefore, the appellant does not want to pursue this matter. 2. Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Thawaney, this appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant