Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1657 (GAU)

IMARAJ UDDIN CHOUDHURY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./3711/2025 · 2026-01-20

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010254192025 2026:GAU-AS:671 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3711/2025 IMARAJ UDDIN CHOUDHURY S/O NUR ISLAM CHOUDHURY,R/O VILLAGE BOALL CHANDMARI,P.S. LAKHIPUR,DISTRICT CACHAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K DEKA, MS. N M LONGKENG,MR. R. KARIM,MR. P DAIMARY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 21.01.2026 Heard Mr P K Deka, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr B Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam, who has submitted that the charge sheet in the matter has been submitted vide CS No. 126/2025, dated 25.10.2025. Page No.# 2/2 2. Accordingly, Mr Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this bail petition may be closed by affording the petitioner the liberty to approach the learned Trial Court to pray for regular bail in the circumstances. Mr Deka has submitted that that there has been no recovery made from the petitioner and that the petitioner is not in any manner connected with the vehicle. 3. The petitioner would be at liberty to raise all such grounds as may be available to him while approaching the learned Trial Court for regular bail, and the learned Trial Court would consider all grounds raised by the petitioner, as per law. 4. Bail Application stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant