Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16568 (JHR)

KHUBLAL SAO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2053/2026 · 2026-06-15

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:17185 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 2053 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2053 of 2026 Khublal Sao, aged about 58 years, son of Late Bhagirath Saw, resident of Maheshlundi, P.O. Giridih, P.S. Muffasil, District- Giridih … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Advocate Mr. Chanchal Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pathak, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Piyush, Advocate ----- 05/15.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the informant. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.34 of 2026 dated 07.02.2026, registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 352(2), 351(2), 74, 303(2), 125, 109 read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and informant are own brothers. He further submits that the altercation or quarrel took place due to land dispute. He then submits that now a good sense has prevailed between them and they have compromised the matter. He next submits that the compromise petition has been annexed by way of filing supplementary affidavit in the present petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State and informant jointly submit that the compromise memorandum is annexed with the supplementary affidavit. ( 2026:JHHC:17185 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 2053 of 2026 5. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the compromise has taken place between the petitioner and informant. 6. In view of the above and considering that the petitioner and informant are own brothers and dispute arose due to land dispute and further, compromise has taken place between the parties and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Giridih in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.34 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 15th June, 2026 Ajay/