SUNNY SHARMA S/O SH. SATYANARAYAN SHARMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1851/2026 · 2026-02-06
Sandeep Taneja
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16565 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16565 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:5732] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1851/2026 Sunny Sharma S/o Sh. Satyanarayan Sharma, Aged About 19 Years, R/o 106B, Ekta Nagar, Dhabas, Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur, Presently Plot No. 39B, Sundar Nagar B, Police Station Shyam Nagar, Jaipur South. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Order 06/02/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 34/2026 registered at Police Station Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence under Section(s) 8/21 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned Counsel further submits that the quantity of contraband allegedly recovered from the petitioner is below commercial quantity. Counsel also submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent; the petitioner is in custody since long and no recovery is required to be made from the petitioner. He further submits that the conclusion of investigation and trial will take considerable time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody, therefore prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
[2026:RJ-JP:5732] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1851/2026]
3. Per contra, Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the facts that the contraband recovered from the petitioner is below commercial quantity and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, without commenting anything on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioner Sunny Sharma S/o Satyanarayan Sharma is ordered to be released on bail, provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the following conditions:- (i) The accused-petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The accused-petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The accused-petitioner shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial Court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) Violation of any of the above conditions shall be a sufficient ground for the Trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court.
(SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/175