[2026:RJ-JP:4741] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1888/2026 Somnath Greh Nirman Sehakari Samiti Limited, Dausa Registration Number 36 L.d. Through Ramesh Chand Khandelwal S/o Madangopal Khandelwal Resident Of Indra Colony Dausa. ----Petitioner-Plaintiff-Applicant Versus 1. Jabbar Ali Khan S/o Chand Khan, (Since Deceased) 1/1. Noorjahan, Widow Of Jabbar Khan 1/2. Gaffar Khan, S/o Kallu Khan Adopted Son Of Jabbar Khan 2. Abdul Sattar, S/o Chand Khan 3 Kallu Khan S/o Chand Khan, All Are Residents Of Nagauri Mohalla Dausa 4. Ramzani Khan S/o Chand Khan, (Since Deceased) 4/1. Tara, W/o Ramzani Khan 4/2. Khalida Alias Pinky, D/o Ramzani Khan Wife Of Asif Khan 4/3 Nisar Khan, S/o Ramzani Khan 4/4. Majida, D/o Ramzani Khan Wife Of Azharuddin 4/5 Asrar S/o Ramzani Khan, All Are Residents Of Kumharon Ka Mohalla Lalsot Road Dausa 5. Hussain Khan, S/o Chand Khan 6. Abul Majid Alias Rangilal, S/o Chand Khan 7. Gulli Alias Gulab Wife Of Chand Khan (Name Deleted), All Are Residents Of Nagauri Mohalla Dausa 8. Urmila Devi Wife Of Ramjilal, Resident Of Nayi Mandi Road Agarwal Dharamshala Ki Gali Ke Pass, Dausa 9. Smt. Usha Devi Wife Of Yongendra Kumar, Resident Of Dagarwada Tehsil, Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur 10. Geeta Lalwani Wife Of Mahendra Lalwani, Resident Of 809 Ashok Chowk Adarsh Nagar Jaipur 11. Varsha Lalwani Wife Of Girish Lalwani, Resident Of Plot No [2026:RJ-JP:4741] (2 of 3) [CW-1888/2026] 809 Ashok Chowk Adarsh Nagar Jaipur 12. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector Dausa 13. Tehsildar, Tehsil Dausa 14. Sub Registrar, Dausa ----Respondents-Defendants-Non-Applicants For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishwas Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 02/02/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 13.01.2026, passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Dausa, District Dausa, in Civil Suit No. 138/2014, whereby the application to summon the witness was rejected solely on the ground that the plaintiff has failed to assign any reasons or purpose for summoning the said witness. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, without pressing the writ petition on merits, has made an innocuous prayer that he may be granted liberty to file a fresh application after disclosing the reasons and purpose for summoning the witness. 3. Considering the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh application to summon the witness with detailed reasons and purpose. [2026:RJ-JP:4741] (3 of 3) [CW-1888/2026] 4. If such an application is filed, the learned trial Court is expected to decide the same in accordance with the law, without being influenced by the order dated 13.01.2026. 5. If the respondents have any grievance against this order, they are at liberty to file an application to recall the order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/23