Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7892 MFA No. 76 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.76 OF 2020 (CPC) BETWEEN:
SMT. K.R. USHA RANI D/O LATE ATHMANANDA GUPTHA W/O DR. K.V. RAVINDRANATH AGED 60 YEARS R/AT 1632. 4TH CROSS, M.G. ROAD, TUMKUR-572 101. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. K.R. SAGAR S/O KODANDARAMA AGED 27 YEARS C/O. M. RAJU 16, 7TH CROSS, K.G.S. LAYOUT RMV II STAGE, BENGALURU-560 094.
2.
SRI. M. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O G. MUNIYAPPA AGED 38 YEARS R/AT NO.35/1, II CROSS, A.K. COLONY, FRAZER TOWN BENGALURU-560 005.
3.
MRS. CHALLA SUNEETHA REDDY D/O YERRAGUNTA VENKATARAMANA REDDY AGED 39 YEARS NO.F-4, TYPE DEW NVT ORCHID GARDEN,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7892 MFA No. 76 of 2020
CHEMBENAHALLI, SARJAPURA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-562 125.
4.
SMT. YERRAGUNTA VENKATA SUBHASHINI D/O YERRAGUNTA VENKATARAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 405, BALAJI ELITE APARTMENT 2ND SECTOR, 24TH MAIN, H.S.R LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560102.
5.
SMT. PARVATHAMMA W/O LATE H. KRISHNAPPA AGED 76 YEARS
6.
K. GANGAMMA D/O LATE H. KRISHNAPPA AGED 58 YEARS
7.
SRI. K. RAJANNA S/O LATE H. KRISHNAPPA AGED 54 YEARS
8.
SRI. K. RAVI S/O LATE H. KRISHNAPPA AGED 52 YEARS
9.
SRI. K. RAMESH S/O LATE H. KRISHNAPPA AGED 51 YEARS
RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 9 ARE RESIDENT OF CHANAKYA LAYOUT, NAGAVARA VILLAGE, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU-560 045. …RESPONDENTS (R2, R3 AND R4 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7892 MFA No. 76 of 2020
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER:
ORAL JUDGMENT Sri.Vijaya Kumar K., counsel for the appellant appeared in person and submits that the original suit has been disposed of, hence, the appeal has become infructuous. Counsel, therefore, submits that the submission may be noted and the appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
2 When queried, counsel submits that a conscious is taken about dismissal of the appeal as having become infructuous.
3. Submission is placed on record.
4. Resultantly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11