Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16560 (AP)

UNNAM AMRUTHA v. B. UMA MAHESWARA RAO

CC/622/2026 · 2026-03-17

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010065222026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE No: 622/2026 Between: 1. UNNAM AMRUTHA, W/O KISHORE, AGED ABOUT 39, OCC HOUSE WIFE R/O D.NO 11-61/1A, YAZALI VILLAGE, KARLAPALEMMANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. NOW IN BAPATIA DISTRICT. 2. UNNAM KISHORE,, S/O NAGESWARARAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC DAILY WAGER, R/O D.NO 11-61/1A, YAZALI VILLAGE, KARLAPALEMMANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. NOW IN BAPATIA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. B UMA MAHESWARA RAO, THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, BAPATLA TOWN AND DISTRICT. 2. SRI GOGONENI RAMANJANEYULU, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTEND OF POLICE BAPATLA TOWN AND DISTRICT. 3. SRI RAVINDER, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KARLAPALEM POLICE STATION, KARLAPALEM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BHARGAV THIMMARAJU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. A JAYANTHI The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 is filed the Petitioner praying to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.No.17048 of 2025 dated 25.07.2025. 2 2. Heard Sri Bhargav Thimmaraju, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.A.Jayanthi, learned Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the order dated 25.07.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.17048 of 2025 has been complied with, investigation is completed, charge sheet is also filed before the Court of Additional Junior Civil Judge, Bapatla. Hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the contempt proceedings may be closed. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the case may be closed. 5. Considering the submissions, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:18.03.2026 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA C.C.No.622 of 2026 Dt.18.03.2026 Dinesh