Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1656 (GAU)

SMT SUKHILA DEKA v. SRI MRIDUL DEKA

I.A.(Civil)/443/2026 · 2026-02-24

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010029542026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/443/2026 SMT SUKHILA DEKA WO LATE MANHARI DEKA, RO VILL BATIKURIHA, MOUZA NAGAON, DIST BARPETA, ASSAM AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT BARPET TOWN, MOUZA BARPETA, DIST BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781301 2: SRI MUNINDRA DEKA SO LATE MANHARI DEKA RO VILL BATIKURIHA MOUZA NAGAON DIST BARPETA ASSAM AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT BARPET TOWN MOUZA BARPETA DIST BARPETA ASSAM PIN 78130 VERSUS SRI MRIDUL DEKA SO LATE MANHARI DEKA, RO VILL BATIKURIHA, MOUZA NAGAON, DIST BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781301 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B J GHOSH, MR. I ALAM Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Page No.# 2/2 Date : 25.02.2026 Heard Mr. B.J. Ghosh, learned counsel for the applicants This is an application under Section 151 of the CPC, 1908 praying for early hearing of the Regular Second Appeal No. 194/2018. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the appeal was fixed for final hearing on 06.03.2025 but the appeal was adjourned for four weeks on the prayer of the learned counsel for the respondents and thereafter it has not been listed for hearing till date. He further submits that the applicant No. 1 is an old and infirm lady of aged about 90 years and due to the long pendency of the appeal, the applicants are unable to enter into the suit property. Having regard to the above, the prayer for early hearing is allowed. The I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant