Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:12021
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2403 of 2026 1 - Pokhan Lal S/o Bhagwati Prasad Aged About 50 Years Earlier Working As Part Time (Temporary) Pti At Govt. Child Observation Home, Pulgaon, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. R/o Village Arasnara, Post Devada, Tahsil Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Joint Director (Mission Vatsalya) Directorate Of Women And Child Development Department, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Program Officer/secretary District Child Protection Committee, Women And Child Development Department, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Superintendent Govt. Child Observation Home, Pulgaon, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Rupendra Dewangan, Advocate For Respondents-State : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 13 /03/2026
2
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:-
“10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records in relates to the case of petitioner from the possession of respondents for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the impugned advertisement dated 27.11.2025 issued by the respondent no.4 in relates to post on which the petitioner was worked and further be pleased to direct the respondents State to allow the petitioner to perform the duties. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief/relief's in favour of the petitioners, which the Hon'ble Court deemed fit & just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs to the petitioner.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file better constituted petition.
3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY