Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16559 (RAJ)

RAVI S/O PRAKSH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/634/2026 · 2026-01-29

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4369] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 634/2026 1. Ravi S/o Praksh, Resident of Mirjapura, Tehsil Ganga- purcity District Sawai Madhopur. 2. Ravindra S/o Shivcharan, Resident of Mirjapura, Tehsil Gangapurcity District Sawai Madhopur. 3. Boby @ Dilip S/o Khemraj, Resident of Mirjapura, Tehsil Gangapurcity District Sawai Madhopur. 4. Dinesh S/o Khemraj, Resident of Mirjapura, Tehsil Ganga- purcity District Sawai Madhopur. 5. Sagar S/o Jaiprakash, Resident of Mirjapura, Tehsil Gan- gapurcity District Sawai Madhopur. 6. Sonu S/o Jagdish, Resident of Mirjapura, Tehsil Ganga- purcity District Sawai Madhopur. 7. Devendra Nirala S/o Sadhulal, Resident of Mirjapura, Tehsil Gangapurcity District Sawai Madhopur. 8. Guddesh @ Sandeep S/o Khemraj, Resident of Mirjapura, Tehsil Gangapurcity District Sawai Madhopur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor. 2. Laxman Singh S/o Premsingh, R/o Dingotiya Sadar, Gan- gapurcity, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.K. Dixit For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Mohammad Shahid Hassan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 29/01/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.189/2024 registered at Police Station Sadar Gangapur City, District Gangapur City (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 392, 394 & 147 of IPC, on the basis of compromise. [2026:RJ-JP:4369] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-634/2026] 2. Complainant is present in person. He has duly been identified by his counsel. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the respective parties, the material made available for perusal, especially considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.189/2024 registered at Police Station Sadar Gangapur City, District Gangapur City (Rajasthan), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /265