Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16556 (RAJ)

BRIJKISHOR @ MONU S/O SHRI PRAKASH CHAND @ PRAKASH NANDAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1814/2026 · 2026-01-31

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4558] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1814/2026 Brijkishor @ Monu S/o Shri Prakash Chand @ Prakash Nandan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Shyampur Mundari, At Present Near By Patel Nagar Chouraha, Behind Hanuman Tample, Meena Colony Hindaun City, P.s. Naimandi Hindaun City, District Karauli (At Present In Sub Jail Hindaun City District Karauli Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 28/2026 registered at Police Station New Mandi Hindaun, District Karauli for offence under Section 13 of Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance (RPGO), 1949 and under Section 112(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. 4. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2026 and offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are triable by Magistrate. [2026:RJ-JP:4558] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1814/2026] He also submits that there is no criminal antecedence to the discredit of the accused-petitioner. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 6. Taking into consideration the allegations against the accused-petitioner and so also the fact that there is no criminal case is pending against the accused-petitioner and he is in custody since 14.01.2026, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /172