Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16555 (GAU)

M/S NECCON POWER AND INFRA LIMITED AND ANR v. STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.

WP(C)/4926/2026 · 2026-10-13

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010195322026 2026:GAU-AS:15609 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4926/2026 M/S NECCON POWER AND INFRA LIMITED AND ANR FORMERLY KNOWN AS NORTH EASTERN CABLES CONDUCTORS P LTD, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT A.T. ROAD, JORHAT IN THE DISTRICT OF JORHAT, ASSAM AND IS REPRESENTED BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE BASANT KUMAR KHETAN, RESIDEN TOF KHETAN BHAWAN, SEUN ALI, A.T. ROAD, JORHAT, IN THE DISTRICT OF JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN-785001. 2: BRAHMAPUTRA INFRA POWER PRIVATE LIMITED A 100 SUBSIDIARY COMPANY OF PETITIONER NO. 1 NAMELY M/S NECCON POWER INFRA LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT KHETAN BHAWAN SEUNI ALI A. T. ROAD IN THE DISTRICT OF JORHAT ASSAM AND IS REPRESENTED BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE BASANT KUMAR KHETAN RESIDENT OF KHETAN BHAWAN SEUN ALI A.T. ROAD JORHAT IN THE DISTRICT OF JORHAT ASSAM- 78500 VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY POWER, DEPARTMENT OF POWER, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI - 781006 2:STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI - 781006. 3:JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM POWER (ELECTRICITY) DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 4:ASSAM POWER PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED (APPDCL) A JOINT VENTURE COMPANY FORMED BETWEEN GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM AND ILFS AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR JUPITARA PALACE OPP. DONA PLANET GUWAHATI - 781005 AND IS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ASSAM POWER PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED (APDCL). 5:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ASSAM POWER PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED APPDCL GUWAHATI HAVING OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR JUPITARA PALACE OPP. DONA PLANET GUWAHATI - 781005. 6:ASSAM POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED A GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR HAVING OFFICE AT BIJULEE BHAWAN 3RD FLOOR PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI - 781001. 7:ASSAM ELECTRICITY GRID CORPORATION A GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR HAVING OFFICE AT BIJULEE BHAWAN 1ST FLOOR PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI - 781001. Page No.# 3/4 8:APEX INTER DEPARTMENT COORDINATION COMMITTEE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN / PRESIDENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR K TALUKDAR, MS C DAS Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, AEGCL,SC, APGCL,SC, FINANCE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 14.10.2026 1. Heard Mr. K. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. N. Goswami, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam assisted by Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. 2. A dispute arose between the State, more particularly, APGCL and the petitioners regarding the execution of a Small Hydro Power Project. 3. The project could not be completed in time and after verification by a Committee, the State Cabinet decided to finalize the dispute and to pay an amount of Rs. 38.87 crores as a termination settlement to the petitioner, however, a condition was imposed that the petitioner is to furnish a bank guarantee of an equivalent amount. 4. Assailing such a decision to be arbitrary, the present writ petition has been filed. 5. It is argued that the settlement arrived at, is based on a report of the committee constituted by the State, and such an amount was approved by the State cabinet. However, imposition of the condition of furnishing a Page No.# 4/4 bank guarantee, according to the learned counsel for the petitioners, is arbitrary in nature. 6. Mr. Goswami, learned Addl. Advocate General submits that in absence of a specific challenge to the cabinet decision, this Court, at this stage, may not entertain the present writ petition. 7. Mr. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that they may be permitted to file a fresh representation before the Chief Secretary, to the Government of Assam for revisiting such condition by the cabinet and a direction may be issued to consider the same. 8. Mr. Goswami submits that if such a representation is filed, the same will be considered by the competent authority. 9. In view of the aforesaid consensus, the present writ petition stands disposed of by permitting the petitioners to file a fresh representation before the competent authority, through the Chief Secretary to the Government of Assam, and on such representation being filed, the same may be considered by the competent authority within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of such representation. 10. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant