FA 2938/2009 & Anr. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 303 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2938 OF 2009 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS RINABAI ROTU GAVIT AND ORS ... AGP for appellants/State : Mr. S.N. Morampalle ... 305 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2946 OF 2009 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS MIRAJI AKHATYA GAVIT .... AGP for appellants/State : Mr. A.M. Phule ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. Dated : September 30, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. As the acquisition proceeding is of the year 2000, heard finally with the consent of the learned AGP for State. 2. By these appeals, the Appellants/State assail the Judgment and award dated 29.9.2007 passed by the learned Jt. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nandurbar in LAR No. 40/2005 and 29/2005. 3. The respective learned AGP for the appellants submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government 2026:BHC-AUG:46269 FA 2938/2009 & Anr. 2 Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed. 6. In view of dismissal of Appeals, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. ( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) ssc/