Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16549 (GAU)

TAHER KHAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2634/2026 · 2026-10-13

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010225882026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2634/2026 TAHER KHAN S/O. NASHIR UDDIN, R/O. VILL. DHARMASALA PT-IV, P.S. DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N ALAM R K, MR. A RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 14.10.2026 Heard Mr. A. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.G. Baruah, learned APP, for the State. This application, under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, is preferred by the applicant, Taher Khan, who has been apprehending his arrest in connection with Latasil P.S. Case No. 68/2026, under Sections 318(4)/308(3)/315(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023, read with Section 12 of the Assam Money Lenders (Amendment) Act, 2012, for grant of pre-arrest bail. Page No.# 2/2 In the interest of the investigation and in view of the allegations leveled and the state of progression of the investigation, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner can be allowed the opportunity to appear before the I.O. in furtherance of the investigation. Accordingly, the petitioner shall appear before the IO on or before 27/10/2026 to participate in the investigation process. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with 2 sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority. In the event of failure of the petitioner to appear before the IO on or before the date fixed by this Court, the privilege of anticipatory bail shall stand recalled. Anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant