Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16542 (RAJ)

CHHOTILAL S/O LATE SH. BHAGWAN SAHAI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1796/2026 · 2026-01-30

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4382] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1796/2026 Chhotilal S/o Late Sh. Bhagwan Sahai, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Meeno Ka Mohalla, Gram Chatarpura, Police Station Ramnagariya, Jaipur East. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Deepak Sharma with Mr. Puspendra Rana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 30/01/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.339/2023 registered at Police Station Ramnagriya, District-Jaipur City (East) for offences under Sections 323, 341, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 120B of IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. No amount has been recovered from the present petitioner and the dispute appears to be civil in nature. Though seven criminal antecedents of a similar nature have been reported against the present petitioner but in all cases he has been bailed out. He further submits that the case is [2026:RJ-JP:4382] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1796/2026] exclusively triable by a Magistrate. Petitioner is behind the bars since 06.12.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Chhotilal S/o Late Sh. Bhagwan Sahai shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/215