Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1654 (GAU)

RAHUL MISHRA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2905/2025 · 2026-01-27

Pranjal Das

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010273332025 2026:GAU-AS:946 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2905/2025 RAHUL MISHRA S/O LT KISHOR MISHRA R/O AHOM GAON NEAR DPS SCHOOL PS GARCHUK GUWAHATI 35 DIST KAMRUP METRO ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N MILI, MR. R KAMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 28.01.2026 Heard Mr. N Mili, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State. 2. By this subsequent petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner, namely, Rahul Mishra, has prayed for Page No.# 2/3 granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No. 151/2025 under Section 120(B)/419/420/468/471 of IPC. 3. The gist of the allegations in the Ejahar dated 02.02.2025, alleging by one Santanu Bora, is that his brother Sumanta Bora is the victim of impersonation and conspiracy on the part of the accused persons who fraudulently sold his patta land without his knowledge and to facilitate the same a power of attorney was also executed through forgery. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that earlier bail petition was rejected by this Court on 07.08.2025 in AB 1053/2025 after perusal of case diary. By way of subsequent ground, it is stated and submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as per his instruction, a baby was born on 02.11.2025. 5. The learned Addl. P.P. submits that in the meantime, the investigation stands completed resulting in a charge-sheet vide Charge-sheet No.553 dated 22.12.2025. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances, the interim bail granted to the aforesaid petitioners, named above, vide order dated 09.12.2025 is hereby made absolute, subject, of course, to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall be available for the trial, if one commences. (ii) He shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence. (iii) He shall not commit any illegal activities. 7. Violation of any bail condition will entail cancellation of the bail. 8. Accordingly, this instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed and disposed of. Page No.# 3/3 9. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant