SMT. BIMLA DEVI SARPANCH v. SHRI VAIBHAV GALRIYA, SECRETARY
CCP/125/2025 · 2026-02-10
Anil Kumar Upman, Sudesh Bansal
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16539 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16539 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:6270-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 125/2025 In D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.19637/2022 Smt. Bimla Devi Sarpanch, Aged About 60 Years, Gram Panchayat Langdiyawas, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Shri Vaibhav Galriya, Secretary, Urban Development And Housing Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Urban Development And Housing Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 10/02/2026
1. Vide final order dated 04.01.2023 passed in DB Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.19637/2022, petitioner was permitted to submit a representation in respect of the issue to use a land of Khasra Nos.362 & 363 total measuring 20 hectare situated at Village Langdiyawas, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur, recorded as Jungle land, for other purposes and same was directed to be considered & decided by the Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department.
[2026:RJ-JP:6270-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-125/2025]
2. Counsel for the respondents pointed out that in furtherance of the representation, appropriate order dated 23.06.2025 (Ann.R/ 1) has been passed, taking note of the fact that the land in question is not recorded as jungle land and has been released with no objection of the Forest Department, and later on, same has been allotted by JDA to Nagar Nigam.
3. In view of passing of the order dated 26.03.2025, we find that respondents have not committed any disobedience of the
order dated 04.01.2023. If any delay occurred in compliance of the order dated 04.01.2023, the same was due to procedural lapses and is hereby condoned.
4. As a result, the proceedings of instant contempt petition are closed and the contempt petition is hereby dismissed. Notices of contempt stand discharged accordingly.
5. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/30