1 APHC010064612020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 456/2020 Between: 1. M GANGULAIAH, S/O. LATE CHINNABBA, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC- RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O. D. NO. 51-51. 2. P. MUTHYALAIAH, S/O. LATE LAKSHMAIAH, AGED 66 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION AND BUSINESS, R/O. H. NO. 51-97/3. 3. P. RAMAKRISHNAIAH, , S/O. N. CHENGAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O. H. NO. 51-29/1. 4. N. ESWARAMMA, W/O. NAGABUSHANAM, AGED 45 YEARS. 5. T. KALYANI, W/O. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED 30 YEARS. 6. P. NAGARAJA, S/O. LAKSHMAIAH, AGED 70 YEARS. 7. M. GEETHA, W/O. RAVI, AGED 40 YEARS. 8. N. MANJULA, W/O. LATE NAGARAJA, AGED 45 YEARS. 9. M. MADHANA, S/O. CHINNABBA, AGED 68 YEARS. 10. A. ADILAKSHMI, W/O. LATE GURAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 11. M. SUBRAMANI, S/O. M. KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 12. A. SANJEEVI, S/O. GURAVAIAH, AGED 80 YEARS. 2 13. M. RAMAMOORTHY, S/O. SIDDAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS. 14. P. RAJESH, S/O. LATE MANI, AGED 37 YEARS. ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE R/O. UPPARAPALLI VILLAGE, PAKALA POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. L RUDRA KOTI, S/O. LATE LOKANATHAN, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RETIRED RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, R/O. HARIJANAWADA, UPPARAPALLI, PAKALA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. N RANGAMMA, W/O. LATE GOPAL, AGED 70 YEARS, R/O. UPPA - APALLI VILLAGE, PAKALA POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR D STRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SIVA SANKARA RAO BORRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 456/2020 O R D E R: 1. Instant Civil Revision Petition has been preferred against an order dated 20.12.2019 in I.A.No.366 of 2019 arising out of O.S.No.7 of 2017 passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge –cum- Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Pakala. 2. Brief fact of the matter is that:- a suit was filed vide O.S.No.7 of 2017 for permanent injunction. One application was made vide I.A.no.366 of 2019 in the said suit for amendment of cause title of the said Plaint. Learned Court below after hearing the parties, has allowed the prayer under the provision Order VI, Rule 17 read with Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code. The plaintiff being aggrieved by that Order filed the instant Civil Revision Petition. 3. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner/Plaintiff. 4. It appears from the impugned Order that the learned Court below has heard the parties at length and after hearing the parties, he passed the impugned order. I have perused the impugned Order. It appears that the impugned Order suffers no illegality or impropriety. Moreover, the proposed amendment is formal in nature and shall not change the nature and character of the suit. The learned Court below has also find that the issue of jurisdiction can be decided separately by framing an issue therein at the time of Trial. I find no illegality or impropriety in the observation of the learned Trial Court. Accordingly, the instant Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. 4 The learned Court below is directed to dispose of the Suit according to the provisions of the Law as early as possible, most preferably within four (04) months, from the date of passing of this order. 5. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, without costs. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA KS Dated:06.01.2026. 5 03 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.456 OF 2020 DATED:06.01.2026. KS