Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Karnataka · body
2026 DAILYLAW 16535 (KAR)
MR.NAYEEM NOOR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/7805/2025 · 2026-03-05
M Nagaprasanna
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16535 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16535 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7805 OF 2025 C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7679 OF 2025
IN CRL.P No. 7805/2025 BETWEEN:
MR.NAYEEM NOOR S/O NOOR MOHAMMED OMER, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT:NO. 88, MOSQUE ROAD, OPP. KFC, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU – 560 005. …PETITIONER (BY SRI KIRAN S.JAVALI, SR.ADVOCATE FOR SRI AMAR ALEXANDER CORREA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BEGUR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU – 560 068. REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU – 01. Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
2. SRI NAGARAJU S/O. MUNISWAMY @ MUNISHAMI@ CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT: NO. 1115, NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE, BEGURU, BENGALURU – 560 068. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP FOR R-1;
SMT.SUMAN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 528 BNNS, 2023 PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT DATED 30.05.2024, 29.05.2025 IN CR.NO.122/2025 BY RESPONDENT NO.1 BEGURU POLICE FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 3(2)(v), 3(1)(g) OF THE SC/ST (POA) ACT AND SEC.115(2), 138, 190, 304(2), 310(2), 324(5), 331(4), 351(3), 352 OF THE BNS 2023 CORRESPONDING SEC.323, 362, 149, 395, 427, 457, 506, 504) PENDING ON THE FILE OF LXX ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER WHO IS ACCUSED NO.2 VIDE ANNENXURE A AND B.
IN CRL.P NO. 7679/2025 BETWEEN:
1. SRI RAVICHANDRA H.R., S/O RAJASHEKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.748, 18TH MAIN, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU – 560 095. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
...PETITIONER (BY SRI SANDESH J.CHOUTA, SR.ADVOCATE FOR SRI CHANDRA NAIK T., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BEGUR POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. SRI NAGARAJU S/O MUNISWAMI @ MUNISHAMI @ CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, NO.1115, NEAR ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, BEGUR, BENGALURU CITY – 560 068.
...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP FOR R-1;
SMT.SUMAN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 528 BNSS, 2023 PRAYING TO QUASHING THE FIR IN CR.NO.122/2025, REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE (BEGUR P.S) FOR THE O/P/U/S 3(2)(V), 3(1)(g) OF THE SC/ST (POA) ACT-1989 AND SEC.115(2), 138, 190, 304(2), 310(2), 324(5), 331(4), 351(3) AND 352 OF BNS 2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF HON’BLE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT, CCH- 71 AT BANGALORE. - 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners, in these cases, call in question a solitary crime that is registered in Crime No. 122 of 2025 for offences punishable under Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(1)(g) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’, for short) and Sections 115(2), 138, 190, 304(2), 310(2), 324(5), 331(4), 351(3) and 352 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard Sri Kiran S Javali, learned senior counsel appearing for petitioner in Crl.P.No.7805 of 2025 and Sri Sandesh J Chouta, learned senior counsel appearing for petitioner in Crl.P.No.7679 of 2025, Sri Anoop Kumar, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1 and Smt Suman Hegde, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2. - 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
3. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows:
3.1. The 2nd respondent is the complainant. The petitioners in these cases are accused Nos.1 and 2. A complaint comes to be registered on 29-05-2025 alleging several offences against these accused. The complaint then becomes a crime in Crime No. 122 of 2025. Barely within a week, the subject petitions are filed. The crime is interdicted by grant of an interim order of stay at the hands of the co-ordinate Bench. The application seeking vacation of the interim order is preferred by the State and the 2nd respondent/complainant. The matter is heard at that stage. 3.2. It is the case of the complainant that, on 29-05-2025, several persons, including the accused, along with certain henchmen barged into the property of the complainant, kidnapped, thieved and assaulted the complainant apart from trespassing into his property. The backdrop to the said registration of the crime is a claim over the property. The property is the subject matter of a civil suit in O.S.No.2150 of 2007 filed by the father of the complainant. The suit is instituted seeking relief of declaration and possession. The suit
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
comes to be rejected. The rejection of the suit is challenged in the year 2025 before the co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the matter is pending in RFA No.2119 of 2025. 3.3.
Contemporaneously, while filing the Regular First Appeal before this Court, the complainant has also set the criminal law into motion, not on the pendency of the said proceeding or on the same cause of action, but on the several other offences as indicated hereinabove. The registration of the crime against the accused is what has driven the accused to this Court in these subject petitions. 4. The learned senior counsels Sri Kiran S Javali and Sri Sandesh J Chouta appearing for the petitioners in these cases would in unison contend that, the matter which is purely civil in nature is sought to be projected to become a crime, as the father of the complainant who was plaintiff in the aforesaid suit O.S.No.2150 of 2007 has lost the suit and after losing the suit, his son has set the criminal law into motion, now on the ground that the petitioners have trespassed into the property of the complainant. The complainant is not even in possession of
- 7 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
the property and if the complainant is not in possession of the property, it would not become the offence of criminal trespass. 5. The learned senior counsel Sri Kiran S Javali would submit that Sy No. 352 is not even in existence, for which they claim that phodi has been done and now numbered as Sy.No.352/2 to 325/7. Therefore, the claim of the complainant is completely contrary to the record. If the complainant is not in possession of the property, the crime itself could not have been registered against these petitioners is what is urged before the Court. 6.1. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent complainant and the 1st respondent/State would in unison submit that the issue is not with regard to the civil suit being given a colour of crime or a civil proceedings being given a colour of crime. The complainant was in possession of the property.
The possession is determined by the jurisdictional Tahsildar as well, who places a report on conducting an inspection. In the light of the said possession, the petitioners and their henchmen, totally about 500 people, have barged into the property and destroyed several structures that were
- 8 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
existing in the property and kidnapped and abducted a particular person as well. It is on this basis, the crime comes to be registered. Therefore, the fact of possession or otherwise would go into the oblivion, in the light of the other offences of theft and abduction being projected against these petitioners. 6.2. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent submits that the crime is registered 7 days prior to the grant of the interim order. No investigation worth the name is even conducted where there are a plethora of allegations against the petitioners, apart from hurling of abuses which could become the ingredients of the Act. 7. The learned senior counsel Sri Sandesh J Chouta would join issue contending that the crime itself could not have been registered by the police, as the petitioners were in possession. They are bona fide purchasers and the purchaser has entered into a joint development agreement with the petitioner in the companion petition. The issue is, on the face of it, civil in nature and therefore, the complaint could not have been registered and this Court must not permit investigation to be continued in a seemingly civil dispute between the parties. - 9 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
8. I have given my anxious consideration to the
submissions made by the learned senior counsels and the
learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and have perused the material on record.
9. A little walk in the history to consider the issue that is now projected becomes imperative. A suit comes to be filed by the father of the complainant in OS No.2150 of 2007. The Civil Court frames the following issues and additional issues thereon. They read as follows:
“…. …. ….
8. On the above pleadings, my predecessor in office has framed the following;
ISSUES
1. Whether the plaintiff proves that he is the absolute owner in possession of the suit schedule property ?
2. Whether the plaintiff proves that the
Judgment and Decree passed in OS.No.76/1979 in respect of the suit schedule property is not binding on him? 3. Whether the plaintiff proves that the defendants are trying to interfere with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property ? - 10 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
4. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of declaration and permanent injunction as prayed for? Addl. Issues:
1. Whether the 6th defendant proves that he is the bonafide purchaser of a portion of the suit schedule property ? 2. Whether the suit is bad for non joinder of necessary parties? 3. Whether the suit is not properly valued ? 4. Whether the suit is hopelessly barred by limitation? 6. What order or decree ?”
One of the additional issues that was framed by the Concerned Court was, whether the 6th defendant, who is the petitioner in Crl.P.No.7679 of 2025, would prove that he is the bona fide purchaser of a portion of the suit schedule property. The said issue is answered in the negative, notwithstanding the fact that the entire suit itself is negated by the concerned Court, thereby observing that the plaintiff does not prove that he is the absolute owner in possession of the scheduled property. Therefore, the possession itself is in doubt. At paragraph No.21 an observation is made as to who is the bona fide purchaser and it reads as follows:
- 11 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
“21. Plaintiff contended that defendants are trying to interfere with his possession but to prove his possession not even a scrape of paper produced to show his possession over the suit schedule property as on the date of suit. When the documents produced by himself clearly establishes the possession of defendant No.1, such being the thing, the alleged interference as contended by plaintiff holds no water in the eye of law and it is settled law that interference need not be physical even by contesting the case by filing Written statement itself is sufficient but in the present case on hand plaintiff failed to prove neither his title nor possession. On the other hand, defendants have successfully rebutted the case of plaintiff. Hence, plaintiff not entitled for the relief as sought for.
Hence, I answer all issues in the negative.” (Emphasis added)
At paragraph 21, as observed hereinabove, it is mentioned as to who is in possession of the property. The suit is dismissed in the year 2019. Nothing happens thereafter. 10. It transpires that the petitioners have entered into certain further transactions when disturbance ensued and the complainant registers a crime which becomes the fulcrum of Criminal Petition No.11495 of 2024, wherein this Court grants an interim order of stay of further investigation in Crime No.329 of 2024. The subject petitions do not concern the said crime. After the aforesaid proceeding, alleging that the incident
- 12 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
on 29-05-2025, would become the ingredients of all the offences alleged, the crime was registered by the 2nd respondent/complainant. The subject complaint reads as follows:
“ೆಂಗಳರು 29.05.2025 ರವ
ೆ ಆರಕ ೕಕರು, ೇಗೂರು ಆರಕ ಾೆ. ೆಂಗಳರು 560068
ರವಂದ ಾಗಾಜು ಮುಾ @ ಮು!ಾ @ "ನ$ಪ&, ವಯಸು) ಸು*ಾರು 31 ವರುಷ ನಂ.1115, ಆಂಜೇಯ ಾ ,ೇವಾ-ನದ ಹ/0ರ, ೇಗೂರು, ೆಂಗಳರು, 560068 1ಾ/ *ಾ2ಗ 8197771661 / ಾಗಾಜು Nagarajnaga 78583@gmail.com
*ಾನ3ೇ
4ಷಯ :- 2ಾಂಕ 28.05.2025ರ ಾ/5 ಸು*ಾರು 12:30 ಗಂ6ೆ
ೆ ೇಗೂರು
ಾ5ಮದ ಸ7ೇ ಸಂ8ೆ3: 352ರ9: ;ಸ<ಾ=ದ> ?5ೕ ೇಣುAಾ Bಲ:ಮD ,ೇವಾ-ನ, ?5ೕ !ಾಂ/ ಮುೇಶರ ,ೇವಾ-ನ, Fಾಗೂ ನಮD ಮೆಯನು$ ಸಂಪGಣ;7ಾ= ಧIಂಸ
ೊJK ನನ$ ತಮDಾದ Bಲಪ& Fಾಗೂ ವರುM ಅ9OಾP ಅQ& ನನು$ ಬಲವಂತ7ಾ= STಾ$U *ಾVರುವ ಬ
ೆW, ,ೇವಾ-ನದ9: ಇದ>ಂತಹ Bಲ:ಮD ,ೇ4ಯ Fಾಗೂ ?5ೕ !ಾಂ/ ಮುೇಶರನ ಕ9:ನ ಮೂ/;ಗಳY, Bಲ:ಮD ,ೇ4ಯ ಉತ)ವ ಮೂ/;, ,ೇ4ಯ ಅಲಂAಾರದ ಸು*ಾರು 50
ಾ5 ನ ಬಂ
ಾರದ ಒಡ7ೆಗಳY, ಮೆಯ9:ದ> ಾ*ಾನು ಸರಂ1ಾಮು, <ಾU6ಾU, ಬ]ೕ^_5` ಾಧನಗಳY, ನೂಾರು AೋJಗಳನು$ ಕ,ೊ>a>ರುವ ಬ
ೆW, Fಾಗೂ ಹಲವb 7ಾಹನಗಳನು$ ಜಕಂ
ೊJK ನಮD ಕುಟುಂಬದ ಹಲವರ ^ೕ<ೆ ಹ<ೆ: *ಾV dೈfಗಳನು$ ಕKದುAೊಂVರುವ ಬ
ೆW, ದೂರು.
- 13 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
^ೕಲgಂಡ ^ೕಲgಂಡ ^ೕಲgಂಡ ^ೕಲgಂಡ 4ಷಯAೆg 4ಷಯAೆg 4ಷಯAೆg 4ಷಯAೆg ಸಂಬಂhKದಂiೆ ಸಂಬಂhKದಂiೆ ಸಂಬಂhKದಂiೆ ಸಂಬಂhKದಂiೆ ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು
ಾ5ಮದ ಾ5ಮದ ಾ5ಮದ ಾ5ಮದ ಸ7ೆ; ಸ7ೆ; ಸ7ೆ; ಸ7ೆ; ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ.352ರ9: ರ9: ರ9: ರ9: ಜ ೕನು ಜ ೕನು ಜ ೕನು ಜ ೕನು Qiಾ5j;ತ7ಾ= Qiಾ5j;ತ7ಾ= Qiಾ5j;ತ7ಾ= Qiಾ5j;ತ7ಾ= ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ಕುಟುಂಬAೆg ಕುಟುಂಬAೆg ಕುಟುಂಬAೆg ಕುಟುಂಬAೆg ೇದ ೇದ ೇದ ೇದ ಸiಾ0=ದು> ಸiಾ0=ದು> ಸiಾ0=ದು> ಸiಾ0=ದು> Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ಾhೕಾನುಭವದ9:ರುವ ಾhೕಾನುಭವದ9:ರುವ ಾhೕಾನುಭವದ9:ರುವ ಾhೕಾನುಭವದ9:ರುವ ಸತ0ನು$ ಸತ0ನು$ ಸತ0ನು$ ಸತ0ನು$ ನ Dಂದ ನ Dಂದ ನ Dಂದ ನ Dಂದ Aಾನೂರು Aಾನೂರು Aಾನೂರು Aಾನೂರು ಾlರ7ಾ= ಾlರ7ಾ= ಾlರ7ಾ= ಾlರ7ಾ= ಕKದುAೊಳYmವ ಕKದುAೊಳYmವ ಕKದುAೊಳYmವ ಕKದುAೊಳYmವ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ ಆಕ5 ಸುವ ಆಕ5 ಸುವ ಆಕ5 ಸುವ ಆಕ5 ಸುವ ಉ,ೆ>ೕಶ2ಂದ ಉ,ೆ>ೕಶ2ಂದ ಉ,ೆ>ೕಶ2ಂದ ಉ,ೆ>ೕಶ2ಂದ ಎo ಎo ಎo ಎo.ಆಆಆಆp p p p.ರ4ಚಂದ5 ರ4ಚಂದ5 ರ4ಚಂದ5 ರ4ಚಂದ5 <ೇ <ೇ <ೇ <ೇ|| ಾಜ!ೇಖರ ಾಜ!ೇಖರ ಾಜ!ೇಖರ ಾಜ!ೇಖರ ೆVs ೆVs ೆVs ೆVs, Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ tೆ5Kuೕv tೆ5Kuೕv tೆ5Kuೕv tೆ5Kuೕv ಏಕP; ಏಕP; ಏಕP; ಏಕP; tೆx7ೇy tೆx7ೇy tೆx7ೇy tೆx7ೇy 9 6ೆz 9 6ೆz 9 6ೆz 9 6ೆz ಕಂಪಯ ಕಂಪಯ ಕಂಪಯ ಕಂಪಯ ಎAೆ)ಕು3_ೕ{ ಎAೆ)ಕು3_ೕ{ ಎAೆ)ಕು3_ೕ{ ಎAೆ)ಕು3_ೕ{ Tೈೆಕup Tೈೆಕup Tೈೆಕup Tೈೆಕup ಆ=ರುವ ಆ=ರುವ ಆ=ರುವ ಆ=ರುವ ನaೕ| ನaೕ| ನaೕ| ನaೕ| ನೂp ನೂp ನೂp ನೂp ಒಳಸಂಚು ಒಳಸಂಚು ಒಳಸಂಚು ಒಳಸಂಚು ನTೆK ನTೆK ನTೆK ನTೆK ಸಸು*ಾರು ಸಸು*ಾರು ಸಸು*ಾರು ಸಸು*ಾರು 400ಂದ ಂದ ಂದ ಂದ-500 ಜನ ಜನ ಜನ ಜನ ಾV
ೆ ಾV
ೆ ಾV
ೆ ಾV
ೆ Fೆಣು} Fೆಣು} Fೆಣು} Fೆಣು} Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ ಗಂಡು ಗಂಡು ಗಂಡು ಗಂಡು ಗೂಂTಾಗಳನು$ ಗೂಂTಾಗಳನು$ ಗೂಂTಾಗಳನು$ ಗೂಂTಾಗಳನು$ ಕೆaK ಕೆaK ಕೆaK ಕೆaK ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ಮೆ
ೆ ಮೆ
ೆ ಮೆ
ೆ ಮೆ
ೆ ಾ=ಲು ಾ=ಲು ಾ=ಲು ಾ=ಲು ಒTೆದು ಒTೆದು ಒTೆದು ಒTೆದು ಒಳನು=W ಒಳನು=W ಒಳನು=W ಒಳನು=W ಮಲ=ದ> ಮಲ=ದ> ಮಲ=ದ> ಮಲ=ದ> ನನ$ ನನ$ ನನ$ ನನ$, ನನ$ ನನ$ ನನ$ ನನ$ ತಂ,ೆ ತಂ,ೆ ತಂ,ೆ ತಂ,ೆ, ನನ$ ನನ$ ನನ$ ನನ$ ತಮD ತಮD ತಮD ತಮD B B B Bಲ:ಪ& ಲ:ಪ& ಲ:ಪ& ಲ:ಪ&, ನನ$ ನನ$ ನನ$ ನನ$ ೋದರ ೋದರ ೋದರ ೋದರ ಸಂಬಂhOಾದ ಸಂಬಂhOಾದ ಸಂಬಂhOಾದ ಸಂಬಂhOಾದ ವರುM ವರುM ವರುM ವರುM @ ಅQ& ಅQ& ಅQ& ಅQ& Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ ನನ$ ನನ$ ನನ$ ನನ$ ಅಕgನ ಅಕgನ ಅಕgನ ಅಕgನ ಮಗ ಮಗ ಮಗ ಮಗ ಇಂದ5jೕ~ ಇಂದ5jೕ~ ಇಂದ5jೕ~ ಇಂದ5jೕ~ ರವರುಗಳ ರವರುಗಳ ರವರುಗಳ ರವರುಗಳ ^ೕ<ೆ ^ೕ<ೆ ^ೕ<ೆ ^ೕ<ೆ ಎರ= ಎರ= ಎರ= ಎರ= ನಮDನು$ ನಮDನು$ ನಮDನು$ ನಮDನು$ ಹಲವರು ಹಲವರು ಹಲವರು ಹಲವರು lV2ಟುuAೊಂVರುiಾ0ೆ lV2ಟುuAೊಂVರುiಾ0ೆ lV2ಟುuAೊಂVರುiಾ0ೆ lV2ಟುuAೊಂVರುiಾ0ೆ.
ನನ$ ನನ$ ನನ$ ನನ$ ತಮD ತಮD ತಮD ತಮD Bಲ:ಪ& Bಲ:ಪ& Bಲ:ಪ& Bಲ:ಪ& ಮತು0 ಮತು0 ಮತು0 ಮತು0 ವರುM ವರುM ವರುM ವರುMನನು$ ನನು$ ನನು$ ನನು$ ಒಂದು ಒಂದು ಒಂದು ಒಂದು Aಾನ9: Aಾನ9: Aಾನ9: Aಾನ9: tಾ5ಣ tಾ5ಣ tಾ5ಣ tಾ5ಣ ೆದAೆ ೆದAೆ ೆದAೆ ೆದAೆ FಾS FಾS FಾS FಾS ಬಲವಂತ7ಾ= ಬಲವಂತ7ಾ= ಬಲವಂತ7ಾ= ಬಲವಂತ7ಾ= STಾ$U STಾ$U STಾ$U STಾ$U *ಾVAೊಂಡು *ಾVAೊಂಡು *ಾVAೊಂಡು *ಾVAೊಂಡು ಕೆ,ೊ ಕೆ,ೊ ಕೆ,ೊ ಕೆ,ೊa>ರುiಾ0ೆ a>ರುiಾ0ೆ a>ರುiಾ0ೆ a>ರುiಾ0ೆ. ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ಮೆಯ ಮೆಯ ಮೆಯ ಮೆಯ ಬJ ಬJ ಬJ ಬJ ಜ*ಾaKದ> ಜ*ಾaKದ> ಜ*ಾaKದ> ಜ*ಾaKದ> ಗೂಂ•ಾಗಳY ಗೂಂ•ಾಗಳY ಗೂಂ•ಾಗಳY ಗೂಂ•ಾಗಳY ಸು*ಾರು ಸು*ಾರು ಸು*ಾರು ಸು*ಾರು 4-5 1ೆK 1ೆK 1ೆK 1ೆK, €ೕ` €ೕ` €ೕ` €ೕ`<ೈ <ೈ <ೈ <ೈಗಳ ಗಳ ಗಳ ಗಳ ಮೂಲಕ ಮೂಲಕ ಮೂಲಕ ಮೂಲಕ ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ಮೆ ಮೆ ಮೆ ಮೆ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ ಮೆಯ ಮೆಯ ಮೆಯ ಮೆಯ ಆವರಣದ9:Bೕ ಆವರಣದ9:Bೕ ಆವರಣದ9:Bೕ ಆವರಣದ9:Bೕ ಇದ> ಇದ> ಇದ> ಇದ> ?5ೕ ?5ೕ ?5ೕ ?5ೕ ೇಣುAಾ ೇಣುAಾ ೇಣುAಾ ೇಣುAಾ ಯಲ:ಮD ಯಲ:ಮD ಯಲ:ಮD ಯಲ:ಮD ,ೇವಾ-ನ ,ೇವಾ-ನ ,ೇವಾ-ನ ,ೇವಾ-ನ, ?5ೕ ?5ೕ ?5ೕ ?5ೕ !ಾಂ/ !ಾಂ/ !ಾಂ/ !ಾಂ/ ಮುೇಶರ ಮುೇಶರ ಮುೇಶರ ಮುೇಶರ ,ೇವಾ-ನಗಳನು$ ,ೇವಾ-ನಗಳನು$ ,ೇವಾ-ನಗಳನು$ ,ೇವಾ-ನಗಳನು$ ಒTೆದು ಒTೆದು ಒTೆದು ಒTೆದು Fಾಕಲು Fಾಕಲು Fಾಕಲು Fಾಕಲು ಮುಂ,ಾ=ರುiಾ0ೆ ಮುಂ,ಾ=ರುiಾ0ೆ ಮುಂ,ಾ=ರುiಾ0ೆ ಮುಂ,ಾ=ರುiಾ0ೆ. ಈತನD‚ೆ3 ನನ$ ಅಕgನ ಮಗಾದ ಇಂದ5jೕ~ ಸ ೕಪದ9:B ಇದ> Aಾ<ೋಯ9:ರುವ ನಮD ಸFೋದರ/ಸFೋದಯ
ೆ ಸದ 4ƒಾರವನು$ /JKರುiಾ0ೆ. 4ಷಯ /Jದ ಕೂಡ<ೆ ನನ$ ಅಕgನ ಮಗ !ಾಂತಕು*ಾp „ೕ9P ಕಂ6ೊ5ೕf ರೂ| ನ ಸಂ8ೆ3: 112Aೆg ಕೆ *ಾV ಸದ 4ƒಾರವನು$ /JK ರೆಯನು$ Aೋರುiಾ0ೆ. !ಾಂತಕು*ಾpರವರು ಸದ ಜ ೕನ ಕಬJAೆಯ 4ƒಾರದ9: ನಮD ಪರ7ಾ= ಂ/ರುವ ಜಾhAಾರ ಸಂಘಷ; ಪಷ/0ನ Fಾಗೂ Tಾ|| .ಆp. ಅಂೇಡgp ದಂಡು ಸಂಘಟೆಯ ಸದಸ3ಾದ ಪ5Aಾ† ಾಬುರವ
ೆ ಕೆ *ಾVದು> ಅವರೂ ಸಹ „ೕ9P ಕಂ6ೊ5ೕf ರೂ|ನ ಸಂ8ೆ3: 112Aೆg ಕೆ *ಾV ಸದ ಕುಟುಂಬAೆg ಅವರ ಆK0tಾK0ಯ ರೆ *ಾಡೇAೆಂದು Aೋರುiಾ0ೆ. ಅದರಂiೆ ಸ-ಳAೆg ‚ಾ4Kದ Fೊಯ)ಳ 7ಾಹನದ9: ಬಂದ ಆರಕ ಅhAಾ Fಾಗೂ Kಬ‡ಂ2ಯು ಸದ ಗೂಂTಾಗಳY ಕಟuಡ Aೆಡವbವbದನು$ ತTೆ2ರುವb2ಲ:. ನಂತರ ಜಾhAಾರ ಸಂಘಷ; ಪಷ/0ನ Fಾಗೂ Tಾ|| .ಆp. ಅಂೇಡgp ದಂಡು ಸಂಘಟೆಯ ಸದಸ3ಾದ ಆದ†; ಅಯ3pರವರು ೇಗೂರು ಾೆಯ ಆರಕ ೕಕಾದ ಕೃಷ}ಕು*ಾpರವ
ೆ ದೂರ7ಾ‰ ಕೆ *ಾV ನಮD ಕುಟುಂಬAೆg ರೆ ೕಡುವಂiೆ Aೋರುiಾ0ೆ. ಆಗ ಸದಯವರು ಸ ೕಪದ9:Bೕ ಇರುವ ಮiೊ0ಂದು Fೊಯ)ಳ 7ಾಹನವನು$ ಕಳYlKAೊಡುವb,ಾ= /JK,ಾ>ೆ. Fಾಗೂ ಕಳYlKAೊ_uರುiಾ0ೆ. ಆದೆ ೨ Fೊಯ)ಳ 7ಾಹನಗಳ9: ಬಂದ ಆರಕ Kಬ‡ಂ2ಗಳY Oಾವb,ೇ ೕ/ಯ9: ನಮD Fಾಗೂ ನಮD ಆK0tಾK0ಯ ರೆಯನು$ *ಾಡಲು Sಂ"ತು0 ಪ5ಯತ$ *ಾVರುವb2ಲ:. ಇ,ೇ 4ƒಾರವನು$ ಆದ†; ಅಯ3pರವರು ಮiೆ0 ಆರಕ ೕಕ
ೆ ಕೆ *ಾV 4ƒಾರ /JKದು> ಅವರು ಾ/5 ಗK0ನ9:,ೆ>ೕೆ, ಾೇ ಖು,ಾ>= ಅ9:
ೆ ಬರುiೆ0ೕೆ ಎಂದು /JKರುiಾ0ೆ.
ಸು*ಾರು ಾನೂರಂದ ಐನೂರು ಜನ ಗೂಂTಾಗಳY ,ಾJ ನTೆK,
- 14 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
ಆK0tಾK0
ೆ ಗಂŒೕರ7ಾದ Fಾ *ಾಡು/0ದು> ಇಬ‡ರು ವ3S0ಗಳನು$ ಅಪಹKರುವ 4ƒಾರವನು$ /JKದ>ರೂ ಸಹ ಸದ ಆರಕ ೕಕರು ಸದ ಘಟಾ ಸ-ಳAೆg ‚ಾ4ಸಲು ಸು*ಾರು ಒಂದುವೆ ಗಂ6ೆಗಳ ನಂತರ ಘಟಾ ಸ-ಳAೆg ಆಗ Kರುiಾ0ೆ. ಅಷuರ<ಾ:ಗ<ೇ ಎo.ಆp.ರ4ಚಂದ5 Fಾಗೂ ನaೕ| ನೂpನ ಗೂಂTಾಗಳY ನಮD ಮೆ Fಾಗೂ ,ೇವಾ-ನವನು$ ಸಂಪGಣ;7ಾ= Aೆಡ4 FಾS ಸದ ಕಟuಡದ ಪ•ೆಯುJAೆಯನು$ 1ೆKಗಳ ಮೂಲಕ ಸ ೕಪದ9:Bೕ ಅವರ ಾhೕನದ9:ರುವ ಜ ೕೊಳ
ೆ FಾSರುiಾ0ೆ. ಕಟuಡ Aೆಡವb7ಾಗ ತTೆಯಲು ಮುಂ,ಾದ ನಮD ಕುಟುಂಬದ ಸದPಯರ ^ೕ<ೆ ಹ<ೆ: *ಾVರುiಾ0ೆ Fಾಗೂ tಾ5ಣ ೆದAೆ FಾSರುiಾ0ೆ. ಸದಯವರು ನಮD ಕುಟುಂಬದವರನು$ ಕುತು ನಮD Aೆಲಸವನು$ *ಾಡಲು V, ಇಲ:7ಾದೆ ಮDನು$ Aೊಲು:iೆ0ೕ7ೆ ಎಂದು ೆದAೆ FಾSರುiಾ0ೆ
ನಮD ಸFಾಯAೆg ಎಂದು Fೊಯ)ಳ 7ಾಹನದ9: ‚ಾ4Kದ ಆರಕರು Fಾಗು ಅರಕ ೕಕಾಗ9ೕ ನಮD ಮೆ Fಾಗೂ ,ೇವಾ-ನವನು$ ಉJಸಲು Sಂ"ತು0 ಪbಯತ$ *ಾVರುವb2ಲ:. ,ೇವಾ-ನದ 4ಗ5ಹಗಳನು$, ,ೇವರ ಒಡ7ೆಗಳನು$ Fಾಗೂ ಹಲವb ೆ<ೆಾಳYವ ವಸು0ಗಳನು$ ಸದಯವರು ದೋTೆ *ಾVರುವbದನು$ Fಾಗೂ ನಮD ಕುಟುಂಬದ ಇಬ‡ರು ವ3S0ಗಳನು$ ಅಪಹK,ಾ>ೆ. ಅವರ tಾ5ಣAೆg ಆತಂಕ4,ೆ ಎಂದು /JKದರೂ ಸಹ ಅರಕ ೕಕರು ಸದ ಸ/0
ೆ ಸಂಬಂhKದ ,ಾಖ<ಾ/ಗಳನು$ ಸ9:ಸುವಂiೆ ಸೂ"Kರುiಾ0ೆ. ನಮD ರೆ *ಾಡುವbದು ಅವ
ೆ tಾ5ಮುಖ3iೆ ಇರುವಂiೆ ಕಂಡುಬರುವb2ಲ:. ನನ$ ೋದರ Fಾಗೂ ವರುಣ @ ಅQ&ಯನು$ ಅವರುಗJ
ೆ ಏಾದರೂ iೊಂದೆOಾದೆ ಾವb ಸುಮDರುವb2ಲ: ಎಂದು ಆರ`ಷಕ ೕಕ
ೆ ಗಂŒೕರ7ಾ= ಎಚŽKದ ನಂತರ Aೆಲ7ೇ ಷಗಳ9: ಅವಬ‡ರನೂ$ ಅಪಹರಣAಾರರು ಆರಕ ಾೆಯ lಂಬ2ಯ9: ಟುu ಪಾOಾ=ರುiಾ0ೆ. ನನ$ ೋದರ Fಾಗೂ ವರುಣ @ ಅQ&ಯ FೇJAೆಯಂiೆ ಅಪಹರಣAಾರ
ೆ Oಾೋ ಅಾಮ‚ೇಯರು ಕೆ *ಾV ಈ ಕೂಡ<ೆ ಅವರನು$ ಟುuಡೇAೆಂದು /JKದ Aಾರಣ2ಂದ ನಮDನು$ ಟುuಟuರು ಎಂದು /JKರುiಾ0ೆ.
ಅಂದೆ ಅಂದೆ ಅಂದೆ ಅಂದೆ ಾವb ಾವb ಾವb ಾವb ಆರಕ ಆರಕ ಆರಕ ಆರಕ ೕಕ
ೆ ೕಕ
ೆ ೕಕ
ೆ ೕಕ
ೆ ಒತ0ಡ ಒತ0ಡ ಒತ0ಡ ಒತ0ಡ Fೇದ Fೇದ Fೇದ Fೇದ ಕೂಡ<ೇ ಕೂಡ<ೇ ಕೂಡ<ೇ ಕೂಡ<ೇ ಅಪಹರಣAಾರ
ೆ ಅಪಹರಣAಾರ
ೆ ಅಪಹರಣAಾರ
ೆ ಅಪಹರಣAಾರ
ೆ ಕೆ ಕೆ ಕೆ ಕೆ *ಾVರುವbದು *ಾVರುವbದು *ಾVರುವbದು *ಾVರುವbದು ಗಂŒೕರ ಗಂŒೕರ ಗಂŒೕರ ಗಂŒೕರ 4ƒಾರ7ಾ=ದು> 4ƒಾರ7ಾ=ದು> 4ƒಾರ7ಾ=ದು> 4ƒಾರ7ಾ=ದು> ಆರಕ ಆರಕ ಆರಕ ಆರಕ ೕಕರು ೕಕರು ೕಕರು ೕಕರು ಸಸಸಸದ ದ ದ ದ ಎo ಎo ಎo ಎo.ಆp ಆp ಆp ಆp.ರ4ಚಂದ5 ರ4ಚಂದ5 ರ4ಚಂದ5 ರ4ಚಂದ5 Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ ನaೕ| ನaೕ| ನaೕ| ನaೕ| ನೂp ನೂp ನೂp ನೂp 1ೊiೆಯ9: 1ೊiೆಯ9: 1ೊiೆಯ9: 1ೊiೆಯ9: !ಾ ೕ<ಾ=ರುವಂiೆ !ಾ ೕ<ಾ=ರುವಂiೆ !ಾ ೕ<ಾ=ರುವಂiೆ !ಾ ೕ<ಾ=ರುವಂiೆ ಕಂಡು ಕಂಡು ಕಂಡು ಕಂಡು ಬರುತ0,ೆ ಬರುತ0,ೆ ಬರುತ0,ೆ ಬರುತ0,ೆ. ಮುಂದುವೆದಂiೆ ಮುಂದುವೆದಂiೆ ಮುಂದುವೆದಂiೆ ಮುಂದುವೆದಂiೆ ಆಆಆಆರಕ ರಕ ರಕ ರಕ ಾೆಯ ಾೆಯ ಾೆಯ ಾೆಯ ಬJ
ೆ ಬJ
ೆ ಬJ
ೆ ಬJ
ೆ ಬಂದ ಬಂದ ಬಂದ ಬಂದ ಇಬ‡ರು ಇಬ‡ರು ಇಬ‡ರು ಇಬ‡ರು ,ಾJAೋರ ,ಾJAೋರ ,ಾJAೋರ ,ಾJAೋರ ಗೂಂTಾಗಳನು$ ಗೂಂTಾಗಳನು$ ಗೂಂTಾಗಳನು$ ಗೂಂTಾಗಳನು$ ಆಆಆಆರಕ ರಕ ರಕ ರಕ ೕಕರು ೕಕರು ೕಕರು ೕಕರು ಸದ ಸದ ಸದ ಸದ ಆಾ ಗಳನು$ ಆಾ ಗಳನು$ ಆಾ ಗಳನು$ ಆಾ ಗಳನು$ Oಾೆಂದು Oಾೆಂದು Oಾೆಂದು Oಾೆಂದು Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ ಾೆ
ೆ ಾೆ
ೆ ಾೆ
ೆ ಾೆ
ೆ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಸ ಸ ಸ ಸ ಾ/5ಯ9: ಾ/5ಯ9: ಾ/5ಯ9: ಾ/5ಯ9: ಏತAೆg ಏತAೆg ಏತAೆg ಏತAೆg ಬಂ2 ಬಂ2 ಬಂ2 ಬಂ2 ಎಂದು ಎಂದು ಎಂದು ಎಂದು ಸಹ ಸಹ ಸಹ ಸಹ 4ƒಾಸ,ೇ 4ƒಾಸ,ೇ 4ƒಾಸ,ೇ 4ƒಾಸ,ೇ Fಾ
ೆBೕ Fಾ
ೆBೕ Fಾ
ೆBೕ Fಾ
ೆBೕ lಂ2ರುಗುವಂiೆ lಂ2ರುಗುವಂiೆ lಂ2ರುಗುವಂiೆ lಂ2ರುಗುವಂiೆ ಸೆ$ ಸೆ$ ಸೆ$ ಸೆ$ *ಾVರುವಂiೆ *ಾVರುವಂiೆ *ಾVರುವಂiೆ *ಾVರುವಂiೆ ಕಂಡುಬಂ2ರುತ0,ೆ ಕಂಡುಬಂ2ರುತ0,ೆ ಕಂಡುಬಂ2ರುತ0,ೆ ಕಂಡುಬಂ2ರುತ0,ೆ.
,ಾJAೋರ ,ಾJAೋರ ,ಾJAೋರ ,ಾJAೋರ ಗೂಂTಾ ಗೂಂTಾ ಗೂಂTಾ ಗೂಂTಾಗಗಗಗಳನು$ ಳನು$ ಳನು$ ಳನು$ ಾವb ಾವb ಾವb ಾವb ಗುರು/K ಗುರು/K ಗುರು/K ಗುರು/K ಇವರುಗ•ೇ ಇವರುಗ•ೇ ಇವರುಗ•ೇ ಇವರುಗ•ೇ ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ಆK0tಾK0ಗಳನು$ ಆK0tಾK0ಗಳನು$ ಆK0tಾK0ಗಳನು$ ಆK0tಾK0ಗಳನು$ ಧIಂಸ ಧIಂಸ ಧIಂಸ ಧIಂಸ *ಾVದು> *ಾVದು> *ಾVದು> *ಾVದು> ಎಂಬು,ಾ= ಎಂಬು,ಾ= ಎಂಬು,ಾ= ಎಂಬು,ಾ= ಅ9:Bೕ ಅ9:Bೕ ಅ9:Bೕ ಅ9:Bೕ ಇದ> ಇದ> ಇದ> ಇದ> ಅನ3 ಅನ3 ಅನ3 ಅನ3 ಆರಕ
ೆ ಆರಕ
ೆ ಆರಕ
ೆ ಆರಕ
ೆ /JK /JK /JK /JK ಾವbಗ•ೇ ಾವbಗ•ೇ ಾವbಗ•ೇ ಾವbಗ•ೇ ಅವರನು$ ಅವರನು$ ಅವರನು$ ಅವರನು$ ಬಂhಸುವಂiೆ ಬಂhಸುವಂiೆ ಬಂhಸುವಂiೆ ಬಂhಸುವಂiೆ ಒiಾ0aKದ ಒiಾ0aKದ ಒiಾ0aKದ ಒiಾ0aKದ ನಂತರ7ೇ ನಂತರ7ೇ ನಂತರ7ೇ ನಂತರ7ೇ ಅವರನು$ ಅವರನು$ ಅವರನು$ ಅವರನು$ ಾಮAಾವೆ-
ೆ ಾಮAಾವೆ-
ೆ ಾಮAಾವೆ-
ೆ ಾಮAಾವೆ-
ೆ ಸುಪ2;
ೆ ಸುಪ2;
ೆ ಸುಪ2;
ೆ ಸುಪ2;
ೆ ಪTೆ2ರುiಾ0ೆ ಪTೆ2ರುiಾ0ೆ ಪTೆ2ರುiಾ0ೆ ಪTೆ2ರುiಾ0ೆ. ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಎ<ಾ: ಎ<ಾ: ಎ<ಾ: ಎ<ಾ: ಘಟೆಗಳY ಘಟೆಗಳY ಘಟೆಗಳY ಘಟೆಗಳY ಆರಕ ಆರಕ ಆರಕ ಆರಕ ೕಕಾದ ೕಕಾದ ೕಕಾದ ೕಕಾದ
- 15 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
ಕೃಷ}ಕು*ಾp ಕೃಷ}ಕು*ಾp ಕೃಷ}ಕು*ಾp ಕೃಷ}ಕು*ಾpರವರು ರವರು ರವರು ರವರು ಆೋQತ ಆೋQತ ಆೋQತ ಆೋQತ ರ4ಚಂದ5 ರ4ಚಂದ5 ರ4ಚಂದ5 ರ4ಚಂದ5 Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ ನaೕಂ ನaೕಂ ನaೕಂ ನaೕಂ ನೂ ನೂ ನೂ ನೂp p p p 1ೊiೆ 1ೊiೆ 1ೊiೆ 1ೊiೆ !ಾ ೕ<ಾ=ರುವbದು !ಾ ೕ<ಾ=ರುವbದು !ಾ ೕ<ಾ=ರುವbದು !ಾ ೕ<ಾ=ರುವbದು ಾೕiಾಗುತ0,ೆ ಾೕiಾಗುತ0,ೆ ಾೕiಾಗುತ0,ೆ ಾೕiಾಗುತ0,ೆ. ,ಾJAೋರ ,ಾJAೋರ ,ಾJAೋರ ,ಾJAೋರ ಗೂಂTಾಗಳY ಗೂಂTಾಗಳY ಗೂಂTಾಗಳY ಗೂಂTಾಗಳY ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ಮೆಯ ಮೆಯ ಮೆಯ ಮೆಯ ೕರು4ನ9:,ೆ ೕರು4ನ9:,ೆ ೕರು4ನ9:,ೆ ೕರು4ನ9:,ೆ. ,ೇವರ ,ೇವರ ,ೇವರ ,ೇವರ ಒಡ7ೆಗಳನು$ ಒಡ7ೆಗಳನು$ ಒಡ7ೆಗಳನು$ ಒಡ7ೆಗಳನು$ ದೋTೆ ದೋTೆ ದೋTೆ ದೋTೆ *ಾV,ೆ>ೕ *ಾV,ೆ>ೕ *ಾV,ೆ>ೕ *ಾV,ೆ>ೕ ಅಲ:,ೆ ಅಲ:,ೆ ಅಲ:,ೆ ಅಲ:,ೆ ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ನಮD ಮೆಯ ಮೆಯ ಮೆಯ ಮೆಯ ಆವರಣದ9: ಆವರಣದ9: ಆವರಣದ9: ಆವರಣದ9: ¤°è¸À¯ÁVzÀÝ ನಮD ೆ$ೕlತ ಾಬುರವರ ನಮD ೆ$ೕlತ ಾಬುರವರ ನಮD ೆ$ೕlತ ಾಬುರವರ ನಮD ೆ$ೕlತ ಾಬುರವರ ಪ/$ಯವಾದ ಾಗರತ$ ಎ ಪ/$ಯವಾದ ಾಗರತ$ ಎ ಪ/$ಯವಾದ ಾಗರತ$ ಎ ಪ/$ಯವಾದ ಾಗರತ$ ಎ ರವರ Fೆಸದ9: ರವರ Fೆಸದ9: ರವರ Fೆಸದ9: ರವರ Fೆಸದ9: ೋಂದ‰ ೋಂದ‰ ೋಂದ‰ ೋಂದ‰AiÀiÁVgÀĪÀ Aಾನ ೋಂದ‰ Aಾನ ೋಂದ‰ Aಾನ ೋಂದ‰ Aಾನ ೋಂದ‰ ಸಂ8ೆ3 ಸಂ8ೆ3 ಸಂ8ೆ3 ಸಂ8ೆ3: : : : Aೆಎ Aೆಎ Aೆಎ Aೆಎ 01 01 01 01 ಎ| ಡಬು:’ ಎ| ಡಬು:’ ಎ| ಡಬು:’ ಎ| ಡಬು:’ 9002 9002 9002 9002 *ಾರು/ *ಾರು/ *ಾರು/ *ಾರು/ J¸ÉÖç¸ÉÆì Aಾರನು$ Fಾಗೂ Aೆಎ Aಾರನು$ Fಾಗೂ Aೆಎ Aಾರನು$ Fಾಗೂ Aೆಎ Aಾರನು$ Fಾಗೂ Aೆಎ 51515151 Fೆo Fೆo Fೆo Fೆo 1ೆ 1ೆ 1ೆ 1ೆ 7927 7927 7927 7927 ನಂಬನ FೋಂTಾ V]
ಾVಗಳನು$ ಧIಂಸ
ೊJKರುiಾ0ೆ ನಂಬನ FೋಂTಾ V]
ಾVಗಳನು$ ಧIಂಸ
ೊJKರುiಾ0ೆ ನಂಬನ FೋಂTಾ V]
ಾVಗಳನು$ ಧIಂಸ
ೊJKರುiಾ0ೆ ನಂಬನ FೋಂTಾ V]
ಾVಗಳನು$ ಧIಂಸ
ೊJKರುiಾ0ೆ. . . .
. . . ಸದ ,ಾJAೋರರ ಸದ ,ಾJAೋರರ ಸದ ,ಾJAೋರರ ಸದ ,ಾJAೋರರ ಕೃತ3ವನು$ 4ೕV]ೕ *ಾಡಲು ಪ5ಯ/$Kದ ನಮD dೈf €ೕ ಕೃತ3ವನು$ 4ೕV]ೕ *ಾಡಲು ಪ5ಯ/$Kದ ನಮD dೈf €ೕ ಕೃತ3ವನು$ 4ೕV]ೕ *ಾಡಲು ಪ5ಯ/$Kದ ನಮD dೈf €ೕ ಕೃತ3ವನು$ 4ೕV]ೕ *ಾಡಲು ಪ5ಯ/$Kದ ನಮD dೈf €ೕ ಗಳನು$ ಗಳನು$ ಗಳನು$ ಗಳನು$ ಕKದುAೊಂVರುiಾ0ೆ ಕKದುAೊಂVರುiಾ0ೆ ಕKದುAೊಂVರುiಾ0ೆ ಕKದುAೊಂVರುiಾ0ೆ. . . . Fಾಗೂ ಅವbಗಳ9: Aೆಲವನು$ ಜಕಂ
ೊJKರುiಾ0ೆ Fಾಗೂ ಅವbಗಳ9: Aೆಲವನು$ ಜಕಂ
ೊJKರುiಾ0ೆ Fಾಗೂ ಅವbಗಳ9: Aೆಲವನು$ ಜಕಂ
ೊJKರುiಾ0ೆ Fಾಗೂ ಅವbಗಳ9: Aೆಲವನು$ ಜಕಂ
ೊJKರುiಾ0ೆ. . . . ನನ$ ಅಣ} ನನ$ ಅಣ} ನನ$ ಅಣ} ನನ$ ಅಣ} ಮುಾಜುರವ
ೆ FೊTೆದು dೈಲನು$ ಕKದುAೊಂVದು> ಈವೆಗೂ ಅದು ನಮ
ೆ ಮರJ ಮುಾಜುರವ
ೆ FೊTೆದು dೈಲನು$ ಕKದುAೊಂVದು> ಈವೆಗೂ ಅದು ನಮ
ೆ ಮರJ ಮುಾಜುರವ
ೆ FೊTೆದು dೈಲನು$ ಕKದುAೊಂVದು> ಈವೆಗೂ ಅದು ನಮ
ೆ ಮರJ ಮುಾಜುರವ
ೆ FೊTೆದು dೈಲನು$ ಕKದುAೊಂVದು> ಈವೆಗೂ ಅದು ನಮ
ೆ ಮರJ KSgರುವb2ಲ: KSgರುವb2ಲ: KSgರುವb2ಲ: KSgರುವb2ಲ:. . . . ನಮD ಮೆಯ ಆವರಣ ನಮD ಮೆಯ ಆವರಣ ನಮD ಮೆಯ ಆವರಣ ನಮD ಮೆಯ ಆವರಣ, , , , ,ೇವಾ-ನ ,ೇವಾ-ನ ,ೇವಾ-ನ ,ೇವಾ-ನ, , , , iೆಂಗು iೆಂಗು iೆಂಗು iೆಂಗು, , , , ಹಲKನ ಮರಗಳY ಹಲKನ ಮರಗಳY ಹಲKನ ಮರಗಳY ಹಲKನ ಮರಗಳY, , , , 1ೋಳದ 1ೋಳದ 1ೋಳದ 1ೋಳದ ಸKಗಳY ಎಲ:ವನು$ ಧIಂಸ *ಾVರುiಾ0ೆ ಸKಗಳY ಎಲ:ವನು$ ಧIಂಸ *ಾVರುiಾ0ೆ ಸKಗಳY ಎಲ:ವನು$ ಧIಂಸ *ಾVರುiಾ0ೆ ಸKಗಳY ಎಲ:ವನು$ ಧIಂಸ *ಾVರುiಾ0ೆ. . . . ಮುಂದುವೆದು ಾವb ಾSದ> ನೂಾರು ಮುಂದುವೆದು ಾವb ಾSದ> ನೂಾರು ಮುಂದುವೆದು ಾವb ಾSದ> ನೂಾರು ಮುಂದುವೆದು ಾವb ಾSದ> ನೂಾರು AೋJಗಳನು$ ಸಹ ದೋTೆ *ಾVರುiಾ0ೆ AೋJಗಳನು$ ಸಹ ದೋTೆ *ಾVರುiಾ0ೆ AೋJಗಳನು$ ಸಹ ದೋTೆ *ಾVರುiಾ0ೆ AೋJಗಳನು$ ಸಹ ದೋTೆ *ಾVರುiಾ0ೆ.... ಸದಯವರ ಈ ಎ<ಾ: ಸದಯವರ ಈ ಎ<ಾ: ಸದಯವರ ಈ ಎ<ಾ: ಸದಯವರ ಈ ಎ<ಾ: ಕೃತ3ಗಳY ಪ?ಷu 1ಾ/ ಮತು0 ಪಂಗಡ ,ೌಜ;ನ3 ತTೆ AಾB>ಯ ಕೃತ3ಗಳY ಪ?ಷu 1ಾ/ ಮತು0 ಪಂಗಡ ,ೌಜ;ನ3 ತTೆ AಾB>ಯ ಕೃತ3ಗಳY ಪ?ಷu 1ಾ/ ಮತು0 ಪಂಗಡ ,ೌಜ;ನ3 ತTೆ AಾB>ಯ ಕೃತ3ಗಳY ಪ?ಷu 1ಾ/ ಮತು0 ಪಂಗಡ ,ೌಜ;ನ3 ತTೆ AಾB>ಯ ಕಲಂ ಕಲಂ ಕಲಂ ಕಲಂ 3333((((1111) ( ) ( ) ( ) (jjjj)))), , , , 3333((((2222)()()()(vvvv) ) ) ) Fಾಗೂ žಾರ/ೕಯ ಾ3ಯ ಸಂlತ Fಾಗೂ žಾರ/ೕಯ ಾ3ಯ ಸಂlತ Fಾಗೂ žಾರ/ೕಯ ಾ3ಯ ಸಂlತ Fಾಗೂ žಾರ/ೕಯ ಾ3ಯ ಸಂlತ, , , , 2023 2023 2023 2023ರ ಕಲಂ ರ ಕಲಂ ರ ಕಲಂ ರ ಕಲಂ 331 331 331 331((((4444)))), , , , 137 137 137 137 Fಾಗೂ ಇ$ತರ ಸಂ ೆಯ ಅಪಾಧಗ•ಾ=,ೆ Fಾಗೂ ಇ$ತರ ಸಂ ೆಯ ಅಪಾಧಗ•ಾ=,ೆ Fಾಗೂ ಇ$ತರ ಸಂ ೆಯ ಅಪಾಧಗ•ಾ=,ೆ Fಾಗೂ ಇ$ತರ ಸಂ ೆಯ ಅಪಾಧಗ•ಾ=,ೆ. . . .
. . . ಆದ Aಾರಣ ಆದ Aಾರಣ ಆದ Aಾರಣ ಆದ Aಾರಣ ?ೕ¡5/?ೕಘ¢5 ಸದಯವರ ?ೕ¡5/?ೕಘ¢5 ಸದಯವರ ?ೕ¡5/?ೕಘ¢5 ಸದಯವರ ?ೕ¡5/?ೕಘ¢5 ಸದಯವರ 4ರುದ£ ಸೂಕ0 Aಾನೂನು ಕ5ಮವನು$ ಜರು=ಸೇAೆಂದು Fಾಗು ನಮ
ೆ ನಮD ಜ ೕ 4ರುದ£ ಸೂಕ0 Aಾನೂನು ಕ5ಮವನು$ ಜರು=ಸೇAೆಂದು Fಾಗು ನಮ
ೆ ನಮD ಜ ೕ 4ರುದ£ ಸೂಕ0 Aಾನೂನು ಕ5ಮವನು$ ಜರು=ಸೇAೆಂದು Fಾಗು ನಮ
ೆ ನಮD ಜ ೕ 4ರುದ£ ಸೂಕ0 Aಾನೂನು ಕ5ಮವನು$ ಜರು=ಸೇAೆಂದು Fಾಗು ನಮ
ೆ ನಮD ಜ ೕನ ನ ನ ನ ಾhೕಾನುಭವವನು$ ಪTೆದುAೊಳmಲು ರೆ ಒದ=ಸೇAೆಂದು Aೋ ಈ ದೂರನು$ ಾhೕಾನುಭವವನು$ ಪTೆದುAೊಳmಲು ರೆ ಒದ=ಸೇAೆಂದು Aೋ ಈ ದೂರನು$ ಾhೕಾನುಭವವನು$ ಪTೆದುAೊಳmಲು ರೆ ಒದ=ಸೇAೆಂದು Aೋ ಈ ದೂರನು$ ಾhೕಾನುಭವವನು$ ಪTೆದುAೊಳmಲು ರೆ ಒದ=ಸೇAೆಂದು Aೋ ಈ ದೂರನು$ ಸ9:ಸು/0,ೆ>ೕ7ೆ ಸ9:ಸು/0,ೆ>ೕ7ೆ ಸ9:ಸು/0,ೆ>ೕ7ೆ ಸ9:ಸು/0,ೆ>ೕ7ೆ. . . . ಾ/5Bೕ ಾ/5Bೕ ಾ/5Bೕ ಾ/5Bೕ ಘಟೆ ನTೆ2ದ>ರೂ ಸಹ liೈ¤ಗ•ೆಂ2
ೆ ಸ*ಾ<ೋ"K ಘಟೆ ನTೆ2ದ>ರೂ ಸಹ liೈ¤ಗ•ೆಂ2
ೆ ಸ*ಾ<ೋ"K ಘಟೆ ನTೆ2ದ>ರೂ ಸಹ liೈ¤ಗ•ೆಂ2
ೆ ಸ*ಾ<ೋ"K ಘಟೆ ನTೆ2ದ>ರೂ ಸಹ liೈ¤ಗ•ೆಂ2
ೆ ಸ*ಾ<ೋ"K ದೂರು Kದ£ಪVKAೊಂಡು ಬರಲು ತಡ7ಾದ Aಾರಣ ಮ‚ಾ3ಹ$ ಸು*ಾರು ದೂರು Kದ£ಪVKAೊಂಡು ಬರಲು ತಡ7ಾದ Aಾರಣ ಮ‚ಾ3ಹ$ ಸು*ಾರು ದೂರು Kದ£ಪVKAೊಂಡು ಬರಲು ತಡ7ಾದ Aಾರಣ ಮ‚ಾ3ಹ$ ಸು*ಾರು ದೂರು Kದ£ಪVKAೊಂಡು ಬರಲು ತಡ7ಾದ Aಾರಣ ಮ‚ಾ3ಹ$ ಸು*ಾರು 2 2 2 2 : : : : 50 50 50 50 Aೆg ದೂ Aೆg ದೂ Aೆg ದೂ Aೆg ದೂರು ರು ರು ರು ಸ9:Kರುiೆ0ೕ7ೆ ಆೋQತಾದ ಎoಆp ರ4ಚಂದ5 Fಾ ಸ9:Kರುiೆ0ೕ7ೆ ಆೋQತಾದ ಎoಆp ರ4ಚಂದ5 Fಾ ಸ9:Kರುiೆ0ೕ7ೆ ಆೋQತಾದ ಎoಆp ರ4ಚಂದ5 Fಾ ಸ9:Kರುiೆ0ೕ7ೆ ಆೋQತಾದ ಎoಆp ರ4ಚಂದ5 Fಾಗೂ ಗೂ ಗೂ ಗೂ ನaೕಂ ನaೕಂ ನaೕಂ ನaೕಂ ನೂ ನೂ ನೂ ನೂp p p p ಾಗಾಜು ೆVs ಾಗಾಜು ೆVs ಾಗಾಜು ೆVs ಾಗಾಜು ೆVs Fಾಗೂ ಮುK:ಮರ ಜಾಂಗAೆg ೇರುiಾ0ೆ Fಾಗೂ ಮುK:ಮರ ಜಾಂಗAೆg ೇರುiಾ0ೆ Fಾಗೂ ಮುK:ಮರ ಜಾಂಗAೆg ೇರುiಾ0ೆ Fಾಗೂ ಮುK:ಮರ ಜಾಂಗAೆg ೇರುiಾ0ೆ
ದೂರು,ಾರರ ಸl
ಸl/- ಸl/- ಸl/- ಸl/- ಸl/- (ಾಗಾಜು) (ಮುಾಜು) (ಮುಕೃಷ}) (ಮಂಜುಾಥ) (Bಲ:ಪ&)” (Emphasis added)
- 16 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
This becomes a crime in Crime No. 122 of 2025, for a plethora of offences. The issue now would be, whether on the score that the father of the complainant has lost the civil suit in O.S. No.2150 of 2007, the complainant should be permitted to register the complaint or the State Agency should be permitted to continue with the investigation. 11. As observed hereinabove, the crime is registered on 29-05-2025 and the interim order, in favour of the petitioners is granted on 06-06-2025 and 10-06-2025 respectively, seven to ten days after the registration of the crime. Therefore, the petitions are preferred even before the ink on the crime could dry. The allegation is not limited to the trespass.
The offences are the ones punishable under Section 138 of the BNS which is abduction, 190 of the BNS which is unlawful assembly, 304 of the BNS which is snatching, 324 and 331 of the BNS being mischief and trespass respectively, and Sections 3(1)(g) and 3(2)(v) of the Act for wrongful dispossession of a member of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe for his land or premises knowing that such person belongs to a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe. Therefore, it is an amalgam of
- 17 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
several offences against the petitioners and not only that of trespass. If the entire issue was relating only to the offence of 427 or 447 of the earlier regime, the IPC, which is mischief and criminal trespass respectively, it would have been altogether a different circumstance. The crime being too nascent, this Court would not lend its protective hands to the petitioners without investigation. 12. What is projected is, that the dispute between the parties is purely civil in nature and therefore, the crime cannot spring. It is trite law that merely because a proceeding projects it to be a civil dispute, the criminal proceedings cannot be set aside. Both civil and criminal law, in certain circumstances, can contemporaneously go on is the settled principle of law, which is too well settled by the Apex Court in a plethora of judgments. 12.1. The Apex Court in ROCKY v. STATE OF TELANGANA1 has held as follows:
“…. ….. …. 24. The appellant's core contention, that the dispute is purely civil in nature, is untenable at this
1 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2713
- 18 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
stage. Although courts must guard against giving criminal colour to civil disputes, it is equally well settled that the existence of civil remedies does not preclude criminal prosecution where the allegations disclose the essential ingredients of an offence.
Civil and criminal proceedings may validly coexist if the factual matrix supports both.”
12.2. The Apex Court in ANURAG BHATNAGAR v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)2 has held as follows:
“…. ….. …. 45. The allegations in the application moved under Section 156(3) CrPC and the material in support thereof reveals that SHL is contending breach of the conditions of MoU dated 11.03.1995 and that it has been induced and deceived by VLS for entering into the aforesaid MoU. VLS has cheated SHL and its officers by making a false promise which was legally impossible to be carried out. The allegations of breach of conditions of the MoU or of making a false promise by itself may not give rise to any criminal action as no criminality is attached to it. However, there are elements of inducement, criminal conspiracy and cheating which are also borne out from the allegations made in the application and the complaint, which if proved, may amount to commission of an offence. Therefore, once such allegations are made out, it is difficult for the court in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction to interfere with the FIR, only for the reason that some of the disputes are of civil nature which may or may not be having any criminality attached to it. 46. It is well settled by a catena of decisions of this Court, especially in State of Haryana v. Ch. Bhajan Lal Singh, that the discretion to quash an FIR at a nascent stage has to be exercised with great caution and circumspection.
In this connection, it would be beneficial to
2 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1514
- 19 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
refer to an old case of Privy Council in King Emperor v. Nazir Ahmad Khwaja wherein the law was well settled that the courts would not thwart any investigation or that the courts should be very slow in interfering with the process of investigation. It is only in rare cases where no cognizable offence is disclosed in the FIR that the court may stop the investigation so as to avoid the harassment of the alleged accused. Even in such exercise of power, the court cannot embark upon an inquiry as to the genuineness or otherwise of the allegations made in the FIR or the complaint which have to be examined only after the evidence is collected. 47. The breach of conditions of the MoU or allegations of false promises in relation to the aforesaid MoU are undisputedly subject matter of the different FIRs lodged by VLS itself. Therefore, violation of those conditions for some reasons have been considered by VLS to be offensive. Therefore, the High Court rightly held that if breach of those conditions of the MoU itself has been considered to be of criminal nature by VLS, it cannot be permitted to turn around and allege that such breach of conditions would be of pure civil nature. 48. Thus, in the above facts and circumstances, we do not consider to go into detail as to the exact nature of disputes involved in the FIR and leave the same to be adjudicated upon by the appropriate court where the chargesheets have been submitted.”
12.3. In KATHYAYINI v. SIDHARTH P.S. REDDY3 the Apex Court has held as follows:
“…. …. …. 19. We now come to the issue of bar against prosecution during the pendency of a civil suit.
We hereby hold that no such bar exists against prosecution if the offences punishable under criminal
3 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1428
- 20 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
law are made out against the parties to the civil suit. Learned senior counsel Dr.MenakaGuruswamy has rightly placed the relevant judicial precedents to support the above submission. In the case of K. Jagadish v. Udaya Kumar G.S.3, this Court has reviewed its precedents which clarify the position. The relevant paragraph from the above
judgment is extracted below:
“8. It is thus well settled that in certain cases the very same set of facts may give rise to remedies in civil as well as in criminal proceedings and even if a civil remedy is availed by a party, he is not precluded from setting in motion the proceedings in criminal law.”
20. In Pratibha Rani v. Suraj Kumar4, this Court summed up the distinction between the two remedies as under:
“21. … There are a large number of cases where criminal law and civil law can run side by side. The two remedies are not mutually exclusive but clearly coextensive and essentially differ in their content and consequence. The object of the criminal law is to punish an offender who commits an offence against a person, property or the State for which the accused, on proof of the offence, is deprived of his liberty and in some cases even his life. This does not, however, affect the civil remedies at all for suing the wrongdoer in cases like arson, accidents, etc. It is an anathema to suppose that when a civil remedy is available, a criminal prosecution is completely barred. The two types of actions are quite different in content, scope and import. It is not at all intelligible to us to take the stand that if the husband dishonestly misappropriates the stridhan property of his wife, though kept in his custody, that would bar prosecution under Section 406 IPC or render the ingredients of Section 405 IPC nugatory or abortive. To say that because the stridhan of a married woman is kept in the custody of her husband, no action against him can be taken as no offence is committed is to override and distort the real intent of the law.”
21. The aforesaid view was reiterated in Kamaladevi Agarwal v. State of W.B.,
- 21 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
“17. In view of the preponderance of authorities to the contrary, we are satisfied that the High Court was not justified in quashing the proceedings initiated by the appellant against the respondents. We are also not impressed by the argument that as the civil suit was pending in the High Court, the Magistrate was not justified to proceed with the criminal case either in law or on the basis of propriety.
Criminal cases have to be proceeded with in accordance with the procedure as prescribed under the Code of Criminal Procedure and the pendency of a civil action in a different court even though higher in status and authority, cannot be made a basis for quashing of the proceedings.”
22. After surveying the abovementioned cases, this Court in K. Jagadish (supra) set aside the holding of High Court to quash the criminal proceedings and held that criminal proceedings shall continue to its logical end. 23. The above precedents set by this Court make it crystal clear that pendency of civil proceedings on the same subject matter, involving the same parties is no justification to quash the criminal proceedings if a prima facie case exists against the accused persons. In present case certainly such prima facie case exists against the respondents. Considering the long chain of events from creation of family tree excluding the daughters of K.G. Yellappa Reddy, partition deed among only the sons and grandsons of K.G. Yellappa Reddy, distribution of compensation award among the respondents is sufficient to conclude that there was active effort by respondents to reap off the benefits from the land in question. Further, the alleged threat to appellant and her sisters on revelation of the above chain of events further affirms the motive of respondents. All the above factors suggest that a criminal trial is necessary to ensure justice to the appellant.”
- 22 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
12.4. In PUNIT BERIWALA v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)4 the Apex Court holds as follows:
“…
…. …. MERE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS CANNOT ACT AS A BAR TO INVESTIGATION OF COGNIZABLE OFFENCES
28. It is trite law that mere institution of civil proceedings is not a ground for quashing the FIR or to hold that the dispute is merely a civil dispute.
This Court in various judgments, has held that simply because there is a remedy provided for breach of contract, that does not by itself clothe the Court to conclude that civil remedy is the only remedy, and the initiation of criminal proceedings, in any manner, will be an abuse of the process of the court. This Court is of the view that because the offence was committed during a commercial transaction, it would not be sufficient to hold that the complaint did not warrant a further investigation and if necessary, a trial. [See: Syed Aksari Hadi Ali Augustine Imam v. State (Delhi Admin.), (2009) 5 SCC 528, Lee Kun Hee v. State of UP, (2012) 3 SCC 132 and Trisuns Chemicals v. Rajesh Aggarwal, (1999) 8 SCC 686]”. (Emphasis supplied at each instance)
13. In view of the afore-quoted judgments, the criminal culpability and civil wrong can be the two sides of the same coin insofar as the investigation is concerned, more so in the light of the fact that the jurisdictional Tahsildar has inspected the property and has rendered a report that the family of complainant is residing in Sy.No.352/5 of the suit schedule property.
The report of the Tahsildar reads as follows: 4 2025 SCC OnLine SC 983 - 23 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025 “ಉಪತಹ?ೕ<ಾ>p ಉಪತಹ?ೕ<ಾ>p ಉಪತಹ?ೕ<ಾ>p ಉಪತಹ?ೕ<ಾ>p ರವರAಾOಾ;ಲಯ ರವರAಾOಾ;ಲಯ ರವರAಾOಾ;ಲಯ ರವರAಾOಾ;ಲಯ, ಾಡಕ©ೇ ಾಡಕ©ೇ ಾಡಕ©ೇ ಾಡಕ©ೇ ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು, ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು FೋಬJ FೋಬJ FೋಬJ FೋಬJ, ೆಂಗಳರು ೆಂಗಳರು ೆಂಗಳರು ೆಂಗಳರು ದªಣiಾಲೂ:ಕು ದªಣiಾಲೂ:ಕು ದªಣiಾಲೂ:ಕು ದªಣiಾಲೂ:ಕು ೆಂಗಳರು ೆಂಗಳರು ೆಂಗಳರು ೆಂಗಳರು -560068 ಎ ಎV/ೇ/ಎಂಎPK/Kಆp 88/2025-26 2ಾಂಕ:04/06/2025 (ಲಗತು0 ಕಡತಕ5 ಸಂ 1 ಂರವೆ ೆ) ೆ, ತಹ?ೕ<ಾ>p ರವ ೆ ೆಂಗಳರು ದªಣ iಾಲೂ:ಕು ೆಂಗಳರು 4ಷಯ: ೆಂಗಳರು ದªಣ iಾಲೂ:ಕು ೇಗೂರು FೋಬJ, ೇಗೂರು ಾ5ಮದ ಸ.ನಂ 352/5 Fಾಗೂ 352/6 ರ ಜ ೕನ9: ನTೆದ ಸ-ಳAೆg ೇ_ ೕV ಸ-ಳವನು$ ಪ ?ೕ9K ವರ2 ೕಡಲು Aೋ ಸFಾಯಕ „9ೕP ಆಯುಕ0ರು ಎ<ೆAಾ«` K_ ಉಪ4žಾಗ ೆಂಗಲೂರು ರವರ ಮನ4 ಉ<ೆ:ೕಖ: 1)*ಾನ3 ಸFಾಯಕ „9ೕP ಆಯು`ತ ಕ©ೇ ಎ<ೆAಾ«` K_ ಉಪ4žಾಗ, ರವರ ಪತ5ದ ಸಂ8ೆ3 ©.f.¦.J¸ï/¦J¸ï/ªÉƸÀA 122/2025- 2:30/05/2025 1)*ಾನ3 ತಹ?ೕ<ಾ>p ರವರ ಕ©ೇ ಾಪನ ಪತ5ದ ಸಂ8ೆ3 ಎಂ ಎP K/K ಆp 122/2025-26 2ಾಂಕ:30/05/2025 2)ಾಜಸ ೕಕರ ವರ2 ಸಂ8ೆ3ಾ. (ೇ) Qಆp 33/2025-26 ^ೕಲgಂಡ 4ಷಯAೆg ಸಂಬಂ2Kದಂiೆ, ಉ<ೆ:ೕಖ (1) ರನ ಯ ೆಂಗಳರು ದªಣ iಾಲೂ:ಕು ೇಗೂರು FೋಬJ, ೇಗೂರು ಾ5ಮದ ಸ.ನಂ 352/5 Fಾಗೂ 352/6 ರ ಜ ೕನ9: ನTೆದ ಸ-ಳAೆg ೇ_ ೕV ಸ-ಳವನು$ ಪ ?ೕ9K ವರ2 ೕಡಲು Aೋ ಸFಾಯಕ „9ೕP ಆಯುಕ0ರು ಎ<ೆAಾ«` K_ ಉಪ4žಾಗ ರವರು Aೋ ರುವ ಬ ೆW ಉ<ೆ:ೕಖ (2) ರ ಪತ5ದ9: ಸೂ"Kರುವಂiೆ ಸಂಬಂಧಪಟu ಾಜಸ ೕಕ ಂದ ಉ<ೆ:ೕಖ (3) ರಂiೆ ವರ2 ಪTೆದು ಪ ?ೕ9ಸ<ಾ=, ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು FೋಬJ FೋಬJ FೋಬJ FೋಬJ, ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು ೇಗೂರು ಾ5ಮದ ಾ5ಮದ ಾ5ಮದ ಾ5ಮದ ಸಸಸಸ.ನನನನ 352 ರರರರ ಜ ೕನು ಜ ೕನು ಜ ೕನು ಜ ೕನು ಮೂಲತಃ ಮೂಲತಃ ಮೂಲತಃ ಮೂಲತಃ ಇಾಂ/ ಇಾಂ/ ಇಾಂ/ ಇಾಂ/ ಜ ೕನು ಜ ೕನು ಜ ೕನು ಜ ೕನು ಇದು> ಇದು> ಇದು> ಇದು>, ಸದ ಸದ ಸದ ಸದ ಸಸಸಸ.ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ „ೕVOಾ= „ೕVOಾ= „ೕVOಾ= „ೕVOಾ= ಸಸಸಸ.ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ 352/1, 352,2 352/3, 352/4 352/5 352/6 352/7 352/8 352/9 352/10 352/11 ಎಂಬು,ಾ= ಎಂಬು,ಾ= ಎಂಬು,ಾ= ಎಂಬು,ಾ= „ೕVOಾ=ದು> „ೕVOಾ=ದು> „ೕVOಾ=ದು> „ೕVOಾ=ದು>, ಸದ ಸದ ಸದ ಸದ ಸಸಸಸ.ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ 352/5 ರ9: ರ9: ರ9: ರ9: ೇಣುAಾ ೇಣುAಾ ೇಣುAಾ ೇಣುAಾ ಯಲ:ಮD ಯಲ:ಮD ಯಲ:ಮD ಯಲ:ಮD Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ !ಾಂತ !ಾಂತ !ಾಂತ !ಾಂತ ಮುೇಶ ರ ಮುೇಶ ರ ಮುೇಶ ರ ಮುೇಶ ರ ,ೇವ ಾ-ನ ,ೇವ ಾ-ನ ,ೇವ ಾ-ನ ,ೇವ ಾ-ನ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ ಮು!ಾ ಮು!ಾ ಮು!ಾ ಮು!ಾ ರವರ ರವರ ರವರ ರವರ 7ಾಸದ 7ಾಸದ 7ಾಸದ 7ಾಸದ ಮೆ ಮೆ ಮೆ ಮೆ ಇದು> ಇದು> ಇದು> ಇದು>, ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಬ ೆW ಬ ೆW ಬ ೆW ಬ ೆW ಾ3y ಾ3y ಾ3y ಾ3y <ೈy <ೈy <ೈy <ೈy - 24 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No.
7679 of 2025 ನAಾ!ೆಯಂiೆ ನAಾ!ೆಯಂiೆ ನAಾ!ೆಯಂiೆ ನAಾ!ೆಯಂiೆ ಕಂಡುಬಂ2ದು> ಕಂಡುಬಂ2ದು> ಕಂಡುಬಂ2ದು> ಕಂಡುಬಂ2ದು>, ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಬ ೆW ಬ ೆW ಬ ೆW ಬ ೆW ಾ5ಮಸ-ರು ಾ5ಮಸ-ರು ಾ5ಮಸ-ರು ಾ5ಮಸ-ರು ©ಾಯ ©ಾಯ ©ಾಯ ©ಾಯ "ತ5ಗಳನು$ "ತ5ಗಳನು$ "ತ5ಗಳನು$ "ತ5ಗಳನು$ ೕVರುiಾ0ೆ ೕVರುiಾ0ೆ ೕVರುiಾ0ೆ ೕVರುiಾ0ೆ. ಸಸಸಸ.ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ 352/5 ರ9: ರ9: ರ9: ರ9: 0-13 ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಜ ೕನ9: ಜ ೕನ9: ಜ ೕನ9: ಜ ೕನ9: ಮು!ಾ ಮು!ಾ ಮು!ಾ ಮು!ಾ ಉರು- ಉರು- ಉರು- ಉರು- "ನ$ಪ&
"ನ$ಪ&
"ನ$ಪ&
"ನ$ಪ& Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fೆಂಡ/ Fೆಂಡ/ Fೆಂಡ/ Fೆಂಡ/ ಮುಯಲ:ಮD ಮುಯಲ:ಮD ಮುಯಲ:ಮD ಮುಯಲ:ಮD ಮತು0 ಮತು0 ಮತು0 ಮತು0 ಮಕgಳY ಮಕgಳY ಮಕgಳY ಮಕgಳY ,ೇವಾ-ನದ ,ೇವಾ-ನದ ,ೇವಾ-ನದ ,ೇವಾ-ನದ 1ೊiೆ
ೆ 1ೊiೆ
ೆ 1ೊiೆ
ೆ 1ೊiೆ
ೆ ಮೆಯನು$ ಮೆಯನು$ ಮೆಯನು$ ಮೆಯನು$ ಕ_uAೊಂಡು ಕ_uAೊಂಡು ಕ_uAೊಂಡು ಕ_uAೊಂಡು 7ಾಸ4ರುವb,ಾ= 7ಾಸ4ರುವb,ಾ= 7ಾಸ4ರುವb,ಾ= 7ಾಸ4ರುವb,ಾ= /JKರುiಾ0ೆ /JKರುiಾ0ೆ /JKರುiಾ0ೆ /JKರುiಾ0ೆ. ಮು!ಾ ಮು!ಾ ಮು!ಾ ಮು!ಾ ಉರು- ಉರು- ಉರು- ಉರು- "ನ$ಪ&
"ನ$ಪ&
"ನ$ಪ&
"ನ$ಪ& ರವರು ರವರು ರವರು ರವರು ಆ2 ಆ2 ಆ2 ಆ2 ,ಾ54ಡ ,ಾ54ಡ ,ಾ54ಡ ,ಾ54ಡ ಜಾಂಗದವಾ=ರುವb,ಾ= ಜಾಂಗದವಾ=ರುವb,ಾ= ಜಾಂಗದವಾ=ರುವb,ಾ= ಜಾಂಗದವಾ=ರುವb,ಾ= /JKರುiಾ0ೆ /JKರುiಾ0ೆ /JKರುiಾ0ೆ /JKರುiಾ0ೆ. Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ ಸಸಸಸ.ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ 352/2 ರ9: ರ9: ರ9: ರ9: 0-14 ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ ಸಸಸಸ.ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ 352/5 ರ9: ರ9: ರ9: ರ9: 0-12 ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ EzÀÄÝ, EzÀgÀ 8ಾiೆ,ಾರರುಗಳY 8ಾiೆ,ಾರರುಗಳY 8ಾiೆ,ಾರರುಗಳY 8ಾiೆ,ಾರರುಗಳY ಎಂ ಎಂ ಎಂ ಎಂ ?5ೕ7ಾP ?5ೕ7ಾP ?5ೕ7ಾP ?5ೕ7ಾP Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ SರM SರM SರM SರM AೆAೆAೆAೆ ರವರ ರವರ ರವರ ರವರ Fೆಸನ9: Fೆಸನ9: Fೆಸನ9: Fೆಸನ9: ಕ5ಮ7ಾ= ಕ5ಮ7ಾ= ಕ5ಮ7ಾ= ಕ5ಮ7ಾ= 0-06 ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ, 0-06 ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ MlÄÖ 0-12 ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಗುಂ6ೆ ಈ
ಾಗ<ೇ ಈ
ಾಗ<ೇ ಈ
ಾಗ<ೇ ಈ
ಾಗ<ೇ ಭೂ ಭೂ ಭೂ ಭೂ ಪವತ;ೆOಾ=ರುತ0,ೆ ಪವತ;ೆOಾ=ರುತ0,ೆ ಪವತ;ೆOಾ=ರುತ0,ೆ ಪವತ;ೆOಾ=ರುತ0,ೆ.
Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ Fಾಗೂ ಒಎP ಒಎP ಒಎP ಒಎP ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ 481/2011 ರಂiೆ ರಂiೆ ರಂiೆ ರಂiೆ K4f K4f K4f K4f ಾ3Oಾಲಯದ9: ಾ3Oಾಲಯದ9: ಾ3Oಾಲಯದ9: ಾ3Oಾಲಯದ9: ಸಸಸಸ.ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ 352/2 Fಾ Fಾ Fಾ Fಾಗೂ ಗೂ ಗೂ ಗೂ 352/5 ಜ ೕನುಗಳ ಜ ೕನುಗಳ ಜ ೕನುಗಳ ಜ ೕನುಗಳ ಪ5ಕರಣ ಪ5ಕರಣ ಪ5ಕರಣ ಪ5ಕರಣ ನTೆಯು/0ರುತ0,ೆ ನTೆಯು/0ರುತ0,ೆ ನTೆಯು/0ರುತ0,ೆ ನTೆಯು/0ರುತ0,ೆ. Fಾಗೂ ೆಂಗಳರು 4ದು3~ ಸರಬಾಜು ಕಂಪ ಯ ತ ರವರ ಆpಆp ಸಂ8ೆ3 K¸ï10ºÉZï96948, 2660306192 Fಾಗೂ 14001832 ರಂiೆ 8ಾiೆ ಇದು>, ಸ.ನಂ 352/5 Aೆg ಒಳಪ_uರುತ0,ೆ. ಸದ ಜ ೕ
ೆ ಸಂಬಂhKದಂiೆ ಪ5?$ತ, ಗೂಗf ನ®ೆ ©ಾಯಪ5/ಗಳY Fಾಗೂ ,ಾಖ<ೆಗ•ೆಂ2
ೆ ಮುಂ2ನ ಕ5ಮAೆg ತಮD ಅವ
ಾಹೆ
ೆ ಸ9:K,ೆ. ಸl/- ಉಪತಹ?ೕ<ಾ>ರರು ಾಡಕ©ೇ, ೇಗೂರು FೋಬJ ೆಂಗಳರು zÀQët vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ” (Emphasis added) In that light, investigation in such cases is a must and is in the least. 14. Therefore, finding no merit in these petitions, the petitions stand rejected. Interim order of any kind operating shall stand dissolved. - 25 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13573 CRL.P No. 7805 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 7679 of 2025
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed. SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BKP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 25