Ashalam Alam @ Ashalam Darji v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./30020/2026 · 2026-05-06
Ansul
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16534 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16534 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30020 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2024 Thana- SUGAULI RAIL PS District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ashalam Alam @ Ashalam Darji S/o Sakur Miya @ Sakur Darji R/o vill- Belahiya, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhannjay Kumar Ii, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in Rail Sugauli P.S. Case No. 52 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(B)ii c, 25, 29 N.D.P.S. Act pending before the Special Judge NDPS Court II East Champaran Motihari.
3. The allegation is that 12 kgs 110 gms Charas was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and co-accused.
4. Considering that the commercial quantity of Charas was recovered from the possession of the petitioner which is barred under Section 37 of NDPS Act, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30020 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/2
6. If the trial is not concluded within a period of six months the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.
Vikash/- (Ansul, J) U T