Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16533 (KAR)

SRI ANILKUMAR G R v. SMT CHAYA B S

MFA/6067/2025 · 2026-02-10

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6067 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI.ANILKUMAR G.R., S/O LATE RAMANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT GANGAREKALUVE VILLAGE, DIBBURU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT ...Appellant (By SRI.J.R.JAGADISH, Advocate) AND: SMT.CHAYA B.S., W/O ANILKUMAR G.R., D/O LATE SATHYANARAYANA T.R., AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/AT THIMMAKKA LAYOUT, WARD NO.5, NEAR MED PLUS, CHIKKABALLAPURA TOWN …Respondent This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 19(1) of Family Court Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated 29.04.2025 MFA.No.6067/2025 -------------------------- 2 passed in M.C. No.54/2024 on the file of the Prl. Judge, Family Court, Chikkaballapur, dissolving the petition filed by the petitioner U/S 13(1) (i-a) R/w 11,5 (iii) R/w Section.25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objections, failure to remove the office objections shall result in dismissal of the aforesaid appeal without any further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dt.10.02.2026 not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : MK R By : NR C By : STE