RACHURI NARASIMHA MURTHY v. RACHURI POSEMMA @ KANTAM POSEMMA
CMA/595/2012 · 2026-03-09
Balaji Medamalli, Ravi Nath Tilhari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16532 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16532 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010061132012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572]
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 595/2012 Between:
1. RACHURI NARASIMHA MURTHY, S/O.SATYAM, OCC: JATTU COOLIE R/O.D.NO.1-27, GOLLAGUDEM, H/O.MODUGAGUNTA, TADEPALLIGUDEM [M], WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. RACHURI POSEMMA KANTAM POSEMMA, W/o.Narasimha Murthy, Occ: Coolie R/o.r.D.No.2-28, Chilakampadu, Ganapavaram [M], West Godavari District.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. T DURGA PRASAD RAO Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following:
RNTJ & BMJ CMA No.595 of 2012 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 595 of 2012
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This appeal has been filed by the appellant-husband being aggrieved from the dismissal of his petition for divorce under Section 13(i)(ia)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
2. None appears for the appellant.
3. In view of the aforesaid, the Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J
Dated: 10.03.2026 SJ
RNTJ & BMJ CMA No.595 of 2012 3
268 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 595/2012
Dated: 10.03.2026 SJ