COCP-5401 IN THE HI 102 Jagpati Bai Anurag Rast CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW and others’ of the statem order require P-6 in the sa passed withi would be rel 2. 04.04.2026 Vidhan Sabh points out th (Annexure P already been 5401-2025 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o i Bai Versus g Rastogi and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate fo Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 06.12.2023 (Annex CWP-26346-20234, titled as ‘Jagp ’. The said writ petition was dispo statement made by learned counsel required to be passed in terms of order the said writ petition) or pursuant to within a period of 08 weeks and that be released within a further period of Learned counsel for State has 2026 by way of affidavit of Sh. Rajiv n Sabha Secretariat, Chandigarh on be out that in compliance of the Writ C xure P-1) firstly an order dated 02.04 y been passed. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5401-2025 Date of Decision: 06.04.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA cate for the petitioner. l. A.G., Haryana. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Jagpati Bai vs. State of Haryana s disposed of as not pressed in view unsel for the respondents that any f order dated 30.09.2022 (Annexure ant to the review petition would be d that consequential benefits, if any, iod of four weeks. e has filed compliance report dated . Rajiv Parshad, Secretary, Haryana on behalf of respondent No. 3; and Writ Court order dated 06.12.2023 02.04.2026 (Annexure R-3/1) has ging Writ iew any xure d be any, ated ana and 023 has RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.08 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-5401 3. in para No. as under:- 4. pursuance to CWP-26346 stood passed the petitione 5. for the State learned coun 6. 7. the responde passed in the of ₹10,000/ dated 24.02.2 8. 9. 06.04.2026 rishu 5401-2025 -2- It is further pointed out that the a No. 4 of the order dated 06.12.2023 “4. Learned counsel for the order which is to be passed 30.09.2022 (Annexure P-6) or same will be passed within a today and the same will be infor benefit for which the petitioner in view the order which is to be released within a further period Learned counsel for the respo nce to the order dated 30.09.2022 ch 26346-2023, an order dated 11.07.20 passed. However, the said order dated titioner before the Writ Court. Compliance report dated 04.04. e State is taken on record. A copy t d counsel for the petitioner. Heard. In view of the submissions adv spondent-State noted above, no furth in the present petition; and the same s ,000/- imposed upon respondent No 24.02.2026 also stands waived off. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No at the Writ Court has duly recorded 2.2023 (Annexure P-1) which reads the respondents submits that any sed in terms of the order dated ) or as per review petition, the in a period of eight weeks from informed to the petitioner and any oner becomes entitled for keeping to be passed, the same will also be riod of four weeks.” respondent-State submits that in 022 challenged by the petitioner in .07.2023 (Annexure R-3/3) already r dated 11.07.2023 was withheld by 04.04.2026 filed by learned counsel copy thereof, has been supplied to advanced by learned counsel for o further orders are required to be same stands dismissed; and the cost nt No. 3 by this Court vide order any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE /No /No rded eads ny ed he m ny ng be t in r in ady d by nsel d to l for be cost rder RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.08 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.