DINESH KUMAR S/O SHRI PRABHU DAYAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/1868/2026 · 2026-02-02
Anand Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16530 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16530 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4867] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1868/2026 Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Prabhu Dayal, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Basantpura, Post Bhatiwad, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur
2. Additional Chief Secretary, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. The Dy. Transport Commissioner (Admn.), Transport Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur
4. Regional Transport Officer, Dausa
5. District Transport Officer, Sawaimadhopur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mehla, Adv. Ms. Sunita Mehla, Adv. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 02/02/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition with following prayers:-
“It is, therefore, humbly prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition, and : i) by appropriate writ order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to sanction/release the due salary of petitioner from April 2013 till date with interest. ii) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of
[2026:RJ-JP:4867] (2 of 2) [CW-1868/2026] the case may also be given in favour of the petitioner.”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while responding to an application under Right to Information Act, 2005 filed by the petitioner, the respondents have acknowledged the fact that honorarium of the petitioner from 01.04.2013 is due, yet the same has not been paid till date for no plausible reason.
3.
Learned counsel submits that although, the petitioner has also submitted representation in this regard, yet no response has been given by the respondents.
Learned counsel makes limited prayer that directions be given to the respondents to decide the representation earlier submitted by the petitioner.
4. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the respondents with regard to payment of due honorarium, which shall be considered and decided by the respondents within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order.
5. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /67