IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 29 CONT. PETITION NO. 198 OF 2025 IN FA/2121/2023 Manjiri Shardul Deo VERSUS Shardul Shamprasad Deo And Ors ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sangit Laxman Vishnu AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. S. G. Joshi Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Ms. Rashmi S. Kulkarni ... WITH CONT. PETITION NO. 77 OF 2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8184 OF 2025 IN CP/198/2025 ... CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. Dated : October 08, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. The learned Advocate for the respondent-husband makes a statement that, in compliance with the order dated 29.09.2026, the respondent husband has handed over custody of the minor child Riyansh to the applicant wife yesterday before the learned District Judge-1, Kopargaon. The learned Advocate states that, in view of compliance with the order, the contempt proceedings may be dropped. 2. The learned Advocate for the applicant wife does not dispute that order is complied. However, he opposes the request contending that, as in the past, a possibility of breach of the conditions of Page 1 of 3 2026:BHC-AUG:47486 29 CP 198-2025 visitation rights cannot be ruled out. 3. The learned Advocate for the respondent husband states that, although this Court, by judgment dated 16.10.2024, granted visitation rights to the respondent husband till the application filed at Exhibit 5 in Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 31 of 2025 is decided, the respondent husband shall not exercise the visitation rights granted by this Court. 4. The learned Advocate also makes a statement, in the presence of the respondent-husband, who is a practising Advocate, that henceforth there shall be no breach of the order passed by this Court granting visitation rights, as and when the husband exercises the said rights. 5. The said statement is accepted as an undertaking to this Court. 6. In view of compliance with the order and the statement made today, which is recorded as an undertaking to this Court, this Court is of the opinion that there is no purpose in continuing the contempt proceedings further. 7. The contempt proceedings are disposed of accordingly. Pending civil application is also disposed of. Page 2 of 3 29 CP 198-2025 8. The Civil Miscellaneous Application and the application for interim relief filed in the said proceedings shall be decided on their own merits, in accordance with law. ( ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. ) vj gawade/-. Page 3 of 3